Cited by 407Visual perception and processing mechanismsTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation to the prefrontal cortex impairs metacognitive visual awareness

Rounis, Elisabeth, Maniscalco, Brian, Rothwell, John C., Passingham, Richard E., Lau, Hakwan·2010·Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

We used a recently developed protocol of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), theta-burst stimulation, to bilaterally depress activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex as subjects performed a visual discrimination task. We found that TMS impaired subjects' ability to discriminate between correct and incorrect stimulus judgments. Specifically, after TMS subjects reported lower visibility levels for correctly identified stimuli, as if they were less fully aware of the quality of their visual information processing. A signal detection theory analysis confirmed that the results reflect a change in metacognitive sensitivity, not just response bias. The effect was specific to metacognition; TMS did not change stimulus discrimination performance, ruling out alternative explanations such as TMS impairing visual attention. Together these results suggest that activations in the prefrontal cortex in brain imaging experiments on visual awareness are not epiphenomena, but rather may reflect a critical metacognitive process.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17588921003632529

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is probable that there are transformations available within the brain wherein or is fixed but oi varies.

    “That is, it is probable that there are transformations (as in Equation (9)) available within the brain wherein or is fixed but oi varies.”

    From Falsification and consciousness (2021) · cites this paper as Rounis et al. 2010

  • Noninvasive transcranial brain stimulation and lesions of the lateral PFC impair perceptual abilities under controlled task conditions.

    “Such work would be particularly valuable in evaluating iES effects in light of studies showing that both noninvasive transcranial brain stimulation (Rounis et al., 2010) and lesions (Marinkovic et al., 2000;Del Cul et al., 2009;Fleming et al., 2014;Colas et al., 2019) of the lateral PFC impair perceptual abilities under controlled task conditions.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rounis, E., Maniscalco, B., Rothwell, J. C., Passingham, R. E., & Lau, H.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Maniscalco, Brian
Venue
Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2010-08-18
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
165-175
ISSN
  • 1758-8928 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-8936
OpenAlex
W2092722949
Cited by
407
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 21
FWCI
9.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, metacognition, visual awareness, metacognitive sensitivity, signal detection theory, visual discrimination, response bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review