Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 192

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phylogenetic analyses of melanoma reveal complex patterns of metastatic dissemination

Open access
Sanborn, J. Zachary, Chung, Jongsuk, Purdom, Elizabeth, Wang, Nicholas J., Kakavand, Hojabr, Wilmott, James S., Butler, Timothy, Thompson, John F., Mann, Graham J., Haydu, Lauren E., Saw, Robyn P. M., Busam, Klaus J., Lo, Roger S., Collisson, Eric A., Hur, Joe S., Spellman, Paul T., Cleaver, James E., Gray, Joe W., Huh, Nam, Murali, Rajmohan, Scolyer, Richard A., Bastian, Boris C., Cho, Raymond J.·2015·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Subpopulations of cells in a primary melanoma sometimes disseminate and establish metastases, which usually cause mortality. By sequencing tumor samples from patients with metastatic melanoma never subjected to targeted therapies, we were able to trace the genetic evolution of cells in the primary that seed metastases. We show that distinct cells in the primary depart multiple times in parallel to seed metastases, often after evolving from a common, parental cell subpopulation. Intriguingly, we also determine that single metastases can be founded by more than one cell population found in the primary cancer. These mechanisms show how profound genetic diversity arises naturally among multiple metastases, driving growth and drug resistance, but also indicate that certain mutations may distinguish cells destined to metastasize.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1508074112

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 192

Metadata

Authors
Sanborn, J. Z., Chung, J., Purdom, E., Wang, N. J., Kakavand, H., Wilmott, J. S., Butler, T., Thompson, J. F., Mann, G. J., Haydu, L. E., Saw, R. P. M., Busam, K. J., Lo, R. S., Collisson, E. A., Hur, J. S., Spellman, P. T., Cleaver, J. E., Gray, J. W., Huh, N., Murali, R., Scolyer, R. A., Bastian, B. C., & Cho, R. J.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2015-08-18
Volume
112
Issue
35
Pages
10995-11000
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2106347414
Cited by
192
References
6
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phylogenetic analyses of melanoma reveal complex patterns of metastatic dissemination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1508074112
The paper
Sanborn, J. Z., Chung, J., Purdom, E., Wang, N. J., Kakavand, H., Wilmott, J. S., Butler, T., Thompson, J. F., Mann, G. J., Haydu, L. E., Saw, R. P. M., Busam, K. J., Lo, R. S., Collisson, E. A., Hur, J. S., Spellman, P. T., Cleaver, J. E., Gray, J. W., Huh, N., . . . Cho, R. J. (2015). Phylogenetic analyses of melanoma reveal complex patterns of metastatic dissemination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508074112

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.