Cited by 1,317Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchChromatin Remodeling and Cancer

The patterns and dynamics of genomic instability in metastatic pancreatic cancer

Open access
Campbell, Peter J., Yachida, Shinichi, Mudie, Laura J., Stephens, Philip J., Pleasance, Erin D., Stebbings, Lucy A., Morsberger, Laura A., Latimer, Calli +17 more·2010·Nature

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive malignancy with a five-year mortality of 97-98%, usually due to widespread metastatic disease. Previous studies indicate that this disease has a complex genomic landscape, with frequent copy number changes and point mutations, but genomic rearrangements have not been characterized in detail. Despite the clinical importance of metastasis, there remain fundamental questions about the clonal structures of metastatic tumours, including phylogenetic relationships among metastases, the scale of ongoing parallel evolution in metastatic and primary sites, and how the tumour disseminates. Here we harness advances in DNA sequencing to annotate genomic rearrangements in 13 patients with pancreatic cancer and explore clonal relationships among metastases. We find that pancreatic cancer acquires rearrangements indicative of telomere dysfunction and abnormal cell-cycle control, namely dysregulated G1-to-S-phase transition with intact G2-M checkpoint. These initiate amplification of cancer genes and occur predominantly in early cancer development rather than the later stages of the disease. Genomic instability frequently persists after cancer dissemination, resulting in ongoing, parallel and even convergent evolution among different metastases. We find evidence that there is genetic heterogeneity among metastasis-initiating cells, that seeding metastasis may require driver mutations beyond those required for primary tumours, and that phylogenetic trees across metastases show organ-specific branches. These data attest to the richness of genetic variation in cancer, brought about by the tandem forces of genomic instability and evolutionary selection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature09460

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pancreatic tumours are highly heterogeneous, both within and between individuals.

    “Pancreatic tumours are highly heterogeneous, both within and between individuals.66,67”

    From Early detection of pancreatic cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [66]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Campbell, P. J., Yachida, S., Mudie, L. J., Stephens, P. J., Pleasance, E. D., Stebbings, L. A., Morsberger, L. A., Latimer, C., McLaren, S., Lin, M.-L., McBride, D. J., Varela, I., Nik-Zainal, S. A., Leroy, C., Jia, M., Menzies, A., Butler, A. P., Teague, J. W., Griffin, C. A., Burton, J., Swerdlow, H., Quail, M. A., Stratton, M. R., Iacobuzio-Donahue, C., & Futreal, P. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
  • Institute of Cancer Research (GB)
Corresponding author
Futreal, P. Andrew
Venue
Nature
Published
2010-10
Volume
467
Issue
7319
Pages
1109-1113
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2066254965
Cited by
1,317
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 117 · 2016: 104 · 2015: 119 · 2014: 153 · 2013: 109 · 2012: 135
FWCI
34.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Skip Viragh Foundation
  • Uehara Memorial Foundation
  • Wellcome Trust (077012/Z/05/Z, 088340, 093867, WT088340MA)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA140599, K08CA106610, CA140599, CA106610)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Keywords
pancreatic cancer, metastasis, genomic instability, chromosomal rearrangements, clonal evolution, telomere dysfunction, G1/S checkpoint, copy number alterations, tumor progression, early detection, therapeutic target, interpatient heterogeneity, tumour dissemination, somatic mutations, GATA4, GATA3
MeSH terms
Adenocarcinoma, Cell Cycle, Clone Cells, DNA Mutational Analysis, Humans, Liver Neoplasms, Lung Neoplasms, Neoplasm Metastasis, Organ Specificity, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Mutagenesis, Telomere, Disease Progression, Cell Lineage, Evolution, Molecular, Genomic Instability, Genes, Neoplasm

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review