Cited by 289Language and cultural evolutionEvolution and Genetic DynamicsEvolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Partial connectivity increases cultural accumulation within groups

Open access
Derex, Maxime, Boyd, Robert·2016·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: The remarkable ecological success of the human species has been attributed to our capacity to overcome environmental challenges through the development of complex technologies. Complex technologies are typically beyond the inventive capacities of individuals and result from a population process by which innovations are gradually added to existing cultural traits across many generations. Recent work suggests that a population’s ability to develop technologies is positively affected by its size and connectedness. Here, we present an experiment demonstrating that partially connected groups produce more diverse and complex cultural traits than fully connected groups. This result suggests that changes in patterns of interaction between human groups may have created propitious conditions for the emergence of complex cultural repertoires in our evolutionary past.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1518798113

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. S Wright The roles of mutation inbreeding crossbreeding and selection in evolution. Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Genetics 1 :356–366. (1932).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Derex, M., & Boyd, R.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Derex, Maxime
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2016-02-29
Volume
113
Issue
11
Pages
2982-2987
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2288242710
Cited by
289
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8
FWCI
257.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
John Templeton Foundation (48952)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
Keywords
cultural accumulation, cultural complexity, population fragmentation, cultural diversity, diffusion of innovations, fitness landscape, computer simulation, cultural evolution, group size
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Communication, Creativity, Cultural Evolution, Culture, Diffusion of Innovation, Female, Games, Experimental, Group Processes, Humans, Individuality, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Models, Theoretical, Population Density, Problem Solving, Random Allocation, Social Support, Technology Transfer, Video Games, Therapies, Investigational, Population Groups, Young Adult, Inventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review