Cited by 132Language and cultural evolutionTeam Dynamics and PerformanceGame Theory and Applications

Social learning strategies modify the effect of network structure on group performance

Open access
Barkoczi, Daniel, Galesic, Mirta·2016·Nature Communications

Abstract

The structure of communication networks is an important determinant of the capacity of teams, organizations and societies to solve policy, business and science problems. Yet, previous studies reached contradictory results about the relationship between network structure and performance, finding support for the superiority of both well-connected efficient and poorly connected inefficient network structures. Here we argue that understanding how communication networks affect group performance requires taking into consideration the social learning strategies of individual team members. We show that efficient networks outperform inefficient networks when individuals rely on conformity by copying the most frequent solution among their contacts. However, inefficient networks are superior when individuals follow the best member by copying the group member with the highest payoff. In addition, groups relying on conformity based on a small sample of others excel at complex tasks, while groups following the best member achieve greatest performance for simple tasks. Our findings reconcile contradictory results in the literature and have broad implications for the study of social learning across disciplines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms13109

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The same individuals arranged in a different network can exhibit different emergent behavior.

    “In other words, the same individuals arranged in a different network can exhibit different emergent behavior”

    From Stewardship of global collective behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [68]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hannan M. T. & Freeman J. Organizational Ecology Harvard Univ. Press (1993).
  2. Gigerenzer G. & Todd P. M. The ABC Research Group. Simple Heuristics that Make us Smart Oxford Univ. Press (1999).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barkoczi, D., & Galesic, M.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
Corresponding author
Barkoczi, Daniel
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2016-10-07
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
13109-13109
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2409848655
Cited by
131
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6
FWCI
102.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Santa Fe Institute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Game Theory and Applications
Keywords
social learning, communication network structure, group performance, conformity, copying behavior, task complexity, team decision-making
MeSH terms
Social Learning, Communication, Humans, Problem Solving, Social Behavior, Social Support, Social Networking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review