Cited by 87Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyFossil Insects in AmberPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils

Fuxianhuiid ventral nerve cord and early nervous system evolution in Panarthropoda

Open access
Yang, Jie, Ortega-Hernández, Javier, Butterfield, Nicholas J., Liu, Yu, Boyan, George S., Hou, Jin-bo, Lan, Tian, Zhang, Xi-guang·2016·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Panarthropods are typified by disparate grades of neurological organization reflecting a complex evolutionary history. The fossil record offers a unique opportunity to reconstruct early character evolution of the nervous system via exceptional preservation in extinct representatives. Here we describe the neurological architecture of the ventral nerve cord (VNC) in the upper-stem group euarthropod Chengjiangocaris kunmingensis from the early Cambrian Xiaoshiba Lagerstätte (South China). The VNC of C. kunmingensis comprises a homonymous series of condensed ganglia that extend throughout the body, each associated with a pair of biramous limbs. Submillimetric preservation reveals numerous segmental and intersegmental nerve roots emerging from both sides of the VNC, which correspond topologically to the peripheral nerves of extant Priapulida and Onychophora. The fuxianhuiid VNC indicates that ancestral neurological features of Ecdysozoa persisted into derived members of stem-group Euarthropoda but were later lost in crown-group representatives. These findings illuminate the VNC ground pattern in Panarthropoda and suggest the independent secondary loss of cycloneuralian-like neurological characters in Tardigrada and Euarthropoda.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1522434113

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The organic line system in the Daihua tentacle is inferred to be components of a nervous system, innervating the cushion plate at the tentacle base.

    “We infer this system to be components of a nervous system based on its morphology and preservation mode, innervating the cushion plate at the tentacle base.”

    From Cambrian Sessile, Suspension Feeding Stem-Group Ctenophores and Evolution of the Comb Jelly Body Plan (2019) · cites this paper as [42]

    The paper describes preserved nerve roots in the ventral nerve cord of Chengjiangocaris kunmingensis (Significance; page not available). Searches for Daihua tentacles, an organic line system, and a cushion plate found no passage addressing the claimed innervation. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [24]Butterfield NJ (2002) Leanchoilia guts and the interpretation of three-dimensional structures in Burgess Shale-type fossils. Paleobiology 28(1):155 -177.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, J., Ortega-Hernández, J., Butterfield, N. J., Liu, Y., Boyan, G. S., Hou, J.-B., Lan, T., & Zhang, X.-G.
Affiliations
  • Yunnan University (CN)
  • Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, United Kingdom;
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Guizhou University (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2016-03
Volume
113
Issue
11
Pages
2988-2993
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2291589681
Cited by
87
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11
FWCI
12.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Department of Earth Sciences EPrints Repository (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (41472022, U1402232)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fossil Insects in Amber
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Keywords
ventral nerve cord, nervous system evolution, Panarthropoda, Lower Cambrian, Ecdysozoa, Priapulida, Onychophora, tardigrades, Euarthropoda, nerve roots, segmental ganglia
MeSH terms
Animals, China, Biological Evolution, Fossils, Nervous System, Phylogeny, Species Specificity, Ganglia, Invertebrate, Tardigrada

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review