The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognitive processes underlying human mate choice: The relationship between self-perception and mate preference in Western society
Open accessAbstract
This study tested two hypotheses concerning the cognitive processes underlying human mate choice in Western society: (i) mate preference is conditional in that the selectivity of individuals' mate preference is based on their perception of themselves as long-term partners, and (ii) the decision rule governing such conditional mate preference is based on translating perception of oneself on a given attribute into a comparable selectivity of preference for the same attribute in a mate. Both hypotheses were supported. A two-part questionnaire was completed by 978 heterosexual residents of Ithaca, New York, aged 18–24; they first rated the importance they placed on 10 attributes in a long-term partner and then rated their perception of themselves on those same attributes. Both women and men who rated themselves highly were significantly more selective in their mate preference. When the 10 attributes were grouped into four evolutionarily relevant categories (indicative of wealth and status, family commitment, physical appearance, and sexual fidelity), the greatest amount of variation in the selectivity of mate preference in each category was explained by self-perception in the same category of attributes. We conclude that, in Western society, humans use neither an “opposites-attract” nor a “reproductive-potentials-attract” decision rule in their choice of long-term partners but rather a “likes-attract” rule based on a preference for partners who are similar to themselves across a number of characteristics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures
Buss, D. M. (1989) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00023992 · Cited by 4,484
Cited by
The Evolutionary Psychology of Facial Beauty
Rhodes, G. (2006) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208 · Cited by 1,750
Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression?
Archer, J. (2009) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x09990951 · Cited by 607
MHC-correlated mate choice in humans: A review
Havlicek, J., & Roberts, S. C. (2009) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.10.007 · Cited by 339
A Matching Theory of Entrepreneurs' Tie Formation Intentions and Initiation of Economic Exchange
Vissa, B. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1550086 · Cited by 267
Low-quality females prefer low-quality males when choosing a mate
Holveck, M.-J., & Riebel, K. (2010) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1222 · Cited by 212
Metadata
- Authors
- Buston, P. M., & Emlen, S. T.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-07-03
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 8805-8810
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2118493145
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive processes underlying human mate choice: The relationship between self-perception and mate preference in Western society. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1533220100
- The paper
- Buston, P. M., & Emlen, S. T. (2003). Cognitive processes underlying human mate choice: The relationship between self-perception and mate preference in Western society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1533220100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.