The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cellulose-binding domains promote hydrolysis of different sites on crystalline cellulose
Open accessAbstract
The cohesin-dockerin interaction in Clostridium thermocellum cellulosome mediates the tight binding of cellulolytic enzymes to the cellulosome-integrating protein CipA. Here, this interaction was used to study the effect of different cellulose-binding domains (CBDs) on the enzymatic activity of C. thermocellum endoglucanase CelD (1,4-β- d endoglucanase, EC 3.2.1.4 ) toward various cellulosic substrates. The seventh cohesin domain of CipA was fused to CBDs originating from the Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolases I and II (CBD CBH1 and CBD CBH2 ) (1,4-β- d glucan-cellobiohydrolase, EC 3.2.1.91 ), from the Cellulomonas fimi xylanase/exoglucanase Cex (CBD Cex ) (β-1,4- d glucanase, EC 3.2.1.8 ), and from C. thermocellum CipA (CBD CipA ). The CBD-cohesin hybrids interacted with the dockerin domain of CelD, leading to the formation of CelD-CBD complexes. Each of the CBDs increased the fraction of cellulose accessible to hydrolysis by CelD in the order CBD CBH1 < CBD CBH2 ≈ CBD Cex < CBD CipA . In all cases, the extent of hydrolysis was limited by the disappearance of sites accessible to CelD. Addition of a batch of fresh cellulose after completion of the reaction resulted in a new burst of activity, proving the reversible binding of the intact complexes despite the apparent binding irreversibility of some CBDs. Furthermore, burst of activity also was observed upon adding new batches of CelD–CBD complexes that contained a CBD differing from the first one. This complementation between different CBDs suggests that the sites made available for hydrolysis by each of the CBDs are at least partially nonoverlapping. The only exception was CBD CipA , whose sites appeared to overlap all of the other sites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Deconstruction of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Fuels and Chemicals
Chundawat, S. P. S., Beckham, G. T., Himmel, M. E., & Dale, B. E. (2011) · Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-061010-114205 · Cited by 1,017
Hervé, C., Rogowski, A., Blake, A. W., Marcus, S. E., Gilbert, H. J., & Knox, J. P. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1005732107 · Cited by 305
Lignocellulosic ethanol: From science to industry
Viikari, L., Vehmaanperä, J., & Koivula, A. (2012) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.05.008 · Cited by 263
Self-citationSingh, A., Bajar, S., Devi, A., & Pant, D. (2021) · Bioresource Technology Reports · doi:10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100652 · Cited by 185
Adewuyi, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2022.741570 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Carrard, G., Koivula, A., Söderlund, H., & Béguin, P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-08-29
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 10342-10347
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2152156215
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cellulose-binding domains promote hydrolysis of different sites on crystalline cellulose. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.160216697
- The paper
- Carrard, G., Koivula, A., Söderlund, H., & Béguin, P. (2000). Cellulose-binding domains promote hydrolysis of different sites on crystalline cellulose. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.160216697
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.