Cited by 40

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Geospatial modeling approach to monument construction using Michigan from A.D. 1000–1600 as a case study

Howey, Meghan C. L., Palace, Michael W., McMichael, Crystal H.·2016·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Monumental construction was one way that past societies reconfigured their landscapes in response to social and environmental factors. Given that these factors changed through space and time, societies often constructed multiple types of monuments. We develop a maximum entropy modeling (MaxEnt) framework for identifying the spatioenvironmental factors that mattered most in the placement of different monument types. We turned to MaxEnt, given its ability to model spatial distributions from presence-only data. With modern development continuing to destroy archaeological sites across the globe, archaeological datasets, including monument locations, are evermore restricted to being presence-only data. Our framework shows how archaeologists can harness MaxEnt to develop robust models of past cultural processes, including monumentality, even when faced with limited, presence-only data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1603450113

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Maxent has been broadly used by archaeologists to predict archaeological site locations in different environments and time-periods around the world.

    “Maxent has been broadly used by archaeologists to predict archaeological site locations in different environments and time-periods around the world”

    From A maxent predictive model for hunter-gatherer sites in the southern pampas, argentina (2021) · cites this paper as Howey, Palace & McMichael 2016

  • Having the ability to derive predictive models from presence-only records is particularly relevant in archaeology, as archaeologists often know where some, but not all, sites are located, and they rarely know for certain where past sites are absent.

    “Having the ability to derive predictive models from presence-only records is particularly relevant in archaeology, as archaeologists often know where some, but not all, sites are located, and they rarely know for certain where past sites are absent (Howey, Palace & McMichael 2016).”

    From A maxent predictive model for hunter-gatherer sites in the southern pampas, argentina (2021) · cites this paper as Howey, Palace & McMichael 2016

  • Having the ability to derive predictive models from presence-only records is particularly relevant in archaeology, because archaeologists often know where some but not all sites are located and rarely know for certain where past sites are absent.

    “Having the ability to derive predictive models from presence-only records is particularly relevant in archaeology, as archaeologists often know where some, but not all, sites are located, and they rarely know for certain where past sites are absent”

    From A maxent predictive model for hunter-gatherer sites in the southern pampas, argentina (2021) · cites this paper as Howey, Palace & McMichael 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. 10.1073/pnas.1324000111 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.jaa.2015.11.005 · DOI
  3. R Bradley The Significance of Monuments: On the Shaping of Human Experience in Neolithic and Bronze Age Europe (Routledge, London, 1998).
  4. M Howey Mound Builders and Monument Makers of the Northern Great Lakes 1200-1600 (Univ Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK, 2012).
  5. 10.1126/science.1186019 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/s10814-009-9030-1 · DOI
  7. 10.1103/PhysRev.106.620 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x · DOI · Paper page
  9. M Dudik, S Phillips, R Schapire, Maximum entropy density estimation with generalized regularization and an application to species distribution modeling. J Mach Learn Res 8, 1217–1260 (2007).
  10. 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.5203.x · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.12.015 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2011.06.012 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.jaa.2011.05.003 · DOI
  16. 10.1086/673388 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.11.020 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1111/jbi.12325 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1073/pnas.1019576108 · DOI
  20. G Milner The Moundbuilders: Ancient Peoples of Eastern North America (Thames & Hudson, New York, 2005).
  21. C Thomas Report on the Mound Explorations of the Bureau of Ethnology. 12th Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology for the Years 1890-1891 (Smithsonian Institute, Washington, DC), pp. 3–730 (1894).
  22. J Blitz Moundville (Univ Alabama Press, Tuscalossa, AL, 2008).
  23. J Gibso The Ancient Mounds of Poverty Point: Places of Rings (Univ Press of Florida, Gainsville, FL, 2001).
  24. T Pauketat Cahokia: Ancient America’s Great City on the Mississippi (Penguin Books, New York, 2009).
  25. 10.1016/j.jaa.2010.11.001 · DOI
  26. S Struever, The Hopewell interaction sphere in riverine-western Great Lakes culture history. Hopewellian Studies, eds J Caldwell, R Hall (Illinois State Museum, Springfield, IL), pp. 85–106 (1964).
  27. J Fitting The Archaeology of Michigan: A Guide to the Prehistory of the Great Lakes Region (Cranbrook Institute of Science, 2nd Ed, Bloomfield Hills, MI, 1975).
  28. 10.1179/mca.2011.010 · DOI
  29. E Greenman, Michigan mounds, with special reference to two in Missaukee County. Pa Mich Acad Sci Arts Lett 7, 1–9 (1927).
  30. W Hinsdale Archaeological Atlas of Michigan (Univ Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, 1931).
  31. T Lee, The Parker Earthwork, Corunna, Ontario. Pa Archaeol 28, 5–32 (1958).
  32. J Speth, The Whorley Earthwork. Mich Archaeol 12, 211–227 (1966).
  33. 10.1179/2327427115Y.0000000011 · DOI
  34. A White, R McCullough, D McCullough Archaeological Investigations at Two Late Prehistoric Earthen Enclosures in Indiana (IPFW Archaeological Survey, Fort Wayne, IN, 2003).
  35. R Zurel, Earthwork enclosure sites in Michigan. Retrieving Michigan’s Buried Past: The Archaeology of the Great Lakes State, eds J Halsey, M Stafford (Cranbrook Institute of Science, Bloomfield Hills, MI), pp. 244–248 (1999).
  36. C Milner, J O’Shea, The socioeconomic role of Late Woodland enclosures in Northern Lower Michigan. Ancient Earthen Enclosures of the Eastern Woodlands, eds R Mainfort, L Sullivan (Univ Press of Florida, Gainesville, FL), pp. 181–201 (1998).
  37. 10.2307/40035905 · DOI
  38. S Philips, A brief tutorial in Maxent. Lessons Conserv 3, 107–135 (2010).
  39. 10.2307/280281 · DOI
  40. 10.2307/j.ctvdjrq8t.15 · DOI
  41. 10.3828/bfarm.2003.1.3 · DOI
  42. 10.7183/2326-3768.2.3.195 · DOI
  43. L Goldstein, One-dimensional archaeology and multi-dimensional people: Spatial organization and mortuary analysis. The Archaeology of Death, eds R Chapman, I Kinnes, K Randsborg (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom), pp. 53–69 (1981).
  44. 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-025851 · DOI
  45. 10.3998/mpub.11396699 · DOI
  46. A Blackbird History of the Ottawa and Chippewa Indians of Michigan (Ypsilantian Job Printing House, Ypsilanti, MI, 1887).
  47. P Halstead, J O’Shea, Introduction. Bad Year Economics: Cultural Responses to Risk and Uncertainty, eds P Halstead, J O’Shea (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom), pp. 1–8 (1989). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Howey, M. C. L., Palace, M. W., & McMichael, C. H.
Affiliations
  • Department of Anthropology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824;
  • Earth Systems Research Center, Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824;
  • Paleoecology and Landscape Ecology, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, 1090 GE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2016-06-21
Volume
113
Issue
27
Pages
7443-7448
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
40
References
2
Language
en
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX13AO40G)
  • American Council of Learned Societies (14NE63)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review