The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theory of prokaryotic genome evolution
Open accessAbstract
Significance: Bacteria and archaea have small genomes with tightly packed protein-coding genes. Typically, this genome architecture is explained by “genome streamlining” (minimization) under selection for high replication rate. We developed a mathematical model of microbial evolution and tested it against extensive data from multiple genome comparisons to identify the key evolutionary forces. The results indicate that genome evolution is not governed by streamlining but rather, reflects the balance between the benefit of additional genes that diminishes with the genome size and the intrinsic preference for DNA deletion over acquisition. These results explain the observation that, in an apparent contradiction with the population genetic theory, microbes with large genomes reach higher abundance and are subject to stronger selection than small “streamlined” genomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The origins of genome complexity
Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1089370 · Cited by 1,698
Codling, E. A., Plank, M. J., & Benhamou, S. (2008) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2008.0014 · Cited by 1,482
The Population Genetics of dN/dS
Kryazhimskiy, S., & Plotkin, J. B. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000304 · Cited by 962
Comparative genomics, minimal gene-sets and the last universal common ancestor
Koonin, E. V. (2003) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro751 · Cited by 661
Self-citationThe bioenergetic costs of a gene
Lynch, M., & Marinov, G. K. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1514974112 · Cited by 600
Genomes in turmoil: quantification of genome dynamics in prokaryote supergenomes
Puigbò, P., Lobkovsky, A. E., Kristensen, D. M., Wolf, Y. I., & Koonin, E. V. (2014) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-014-0066-4 · Cited by 232
Self-citation
Cited by
Horizontal gene transfer and adaptive evolution in bacteria.
Arnold, B. J., Huang, I.-T., & Hanage, W. P. (2022) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-021-00650-4 · Cited by 869
Why prokaryotes have pangenomes
McInerney, J. O., McNally, A., & O'Connell, M. J. (2017) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.40 · Cited by 420
The Ecology and Evolution of Pangenomes
Brockhurst, M. A., Harrison, E., Hall, J. P. J., Richards, T., McNally, A., & MacLean, C. (2019) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.08.012 · Cited by 385
A rooted phylogeny resolves early bacterial evolution
Coleman, G. A., Davín, A. A., Mahendrarajah, T. A., Szánthó, L. L., Spang, A., Hugenholtz, P., Szöllősi, G. J., & Williams, T. A. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abe0511 · Cited by 285
Dmitrijeva, M., Tackmann, J., Matias Rodrigues, J. F., Huerta-Cepas, J., Coelho, L. P., & von Mering, C. (2024) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-024-02357-0 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Sela, I., Wolf, Y. I., & Koonin, E. V.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2016-10-04
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 41
- Pages
- 11399-11407
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2529635913
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 9.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theory of prokaryotic genome evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1614083113
- The paper
- Sela, I., Wolf, Y. I., & Koonin, E. V. (2016). Theory of prokaryotic genome evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1614083113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
