The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
When the appeal of a dominant leader is greater than a prestige leader
Open accessAbstract
Across the globe we witness the rise of populist authoritarian leaders who are overbearing in their narrative, aggressive in behavior, and often exhibit questionable moral character. Drawing on evolutionary theory of leadership emergence, in which dominance and prestige are seen as dual routes to leadership, we provide a situational and psychological account for when and why dominant leaders are preferred over other respected and admired candidates. We test our hypothesis using three studies, encompassing more than 140,000 participants, across 69 countries and spanning the past two decades. We find robust support for our hypothesis that under a situational threat of economic uncertainty (as exemplified by the poverty rate, the housing vacancy rate, and the unemployment rate) people escalate their support for dominant leaders. Further, we find that this phenomenon is mediated by participants' psychological sense of a lack of personal control. Together, these results provide large-scale, globally representative evidence for the structural and psychological antecedents that increase the preference for dominant leaders over their prestigious counterparts.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Indeed, especially in times of economic or personal uncertainty, groups have been shown to elect more dominant (Kakkar & Sivanathan, 2017) and narcissistic (Nevicka, De Hoogh, Van Vianen, & Ten Velden, 2013) leaders.”
From The "Why" and "How" of Narcissism: A Process Model of Narcissistic Status Pursuit (2020) · cites this paper as Kakkar & Sivanathan, 2017
Citations
Cites
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559
Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence.
White, R. W. (1959) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0040934 · Cited by 5,681
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · Cited by 4,904 · cited 1×
“We draw upon relevant literature in social psychology (6, 7), political psychology (8), and evolutionary psychology (9, 10) to develop our theoretical arguments.”
BackgroundMotivation reconsidered: The concept of competence.
White, R. W. (1963) · Scott, Foresman eBooks · doi:10.1037/14156-005 · Cited by 4,835
Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/s1090-5138(00)00071-4 · Cited by 2,500 · cited 1×
“The prestige path to attaining an influential position in the group hierarchy is unique to humans; individuals help in disseminating important cultural knowledge that helps others overcome evolutionary selection pressures and increase their adaptation capabilities (20).”
BackgroundSpencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845 · Cited by 2,452
Bargaining Structure, Corporatism and Macroeconomic Performance
Calmfors, L., John Driffill, A., Honkapohja, S., & Giavazzi, F. (1988) · Economic Policy · doi:10.2307/1344503 · Cited by 2,364
Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress.
Averill, J. R. (1973) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0034845 · Cited by 1,570
Social Identity: Context, Commitment, Content
Ellemers, E. (1999) · Cited by 1,455
(1982) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,329
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- JT Spence, RL Helmreich, J Stapp The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A Measure of Sex Role Stereotypes and Masculinity-Femininity. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology 4, 1–42 (1974).
- CR Fox, G Ülkümen, Distinguishing two dimensions of uncertainty. Perspectives on Thinking, Judging, and Decision Making: A Tribute to Karl Halvor Teigen, eds W Brun, G Keren, G Kirkebøen, H Montgomery (Universitetsforlaget, Oslo), pp. 21–35 (2011).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The "Why" and "How" of Narcissism: A Process Model of Narcissistic Status Pursuit
Grapsas, S., Brummelman, E., Back, M. D., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2020) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691619873350 · Cited by 312
“Indeed, especially in times of economic or personal uncertainty, groups have been shown to elect more dominant (Kakkar & Sivanathan, 2017) and narcissistic (Nevicka, De Hoogh, Van Vianen, & Ten Velden, 2013) leaders.”
BackgroundAutocratic leaders and authoritarian followers revisited: A review and agenda for the future
Harms, P. D., Wood, D., Landay, K., Lester, P. B., & Lester, G. V. (2017) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.007 · Cited by 230
Fall from Grace: The Role of Dominance and Prestige in the Punishment of High-Status Actors
Kakkar, H., Sivanathan, N., & Gobel, M. S. (2020) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2017.0729 · Cited by 120
Self-citationTwo signals of social rank: Prestige and dominance are associated with distinct nonverbal displays.
Witkower, Z., Tracy, J. L., Cheng, J. T., & Henrich, J. (2019) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000181 · Cited by 137
A Dual Model of Leadership and Hierarchy: Evolutionary Synthesis
van Vugt, M., & Smith, J. E. (2019) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.09.004 · Cited by 111
Peng, Y. (2018) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqy041 · Cited by 92
Hogg, M. A. (2021) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2021.04.004 · Cited by 86
The Popularity of Authoritarian Leaders
Guriev, S. M., & Treisman, D. S. (2020) · World Politics · doi:10.1017/s0043887120000167 · Cited by 112
The Dominance, Prestige, and Leadership Account of Social Power Motives
Suessenbach, F., Loughnan, S., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Moore, A. (2018) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.2184 · Cited by 85
Dominant leaders and the political psychology of followership.
Petersen, M., & Laustsen, L. (2020) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.005 · Cited by 37
From genes to minds to cultures: Evolutionary approaches to leadership
van Vugt, M., & Rueden, C. R. V. (2020) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101404 · Cited by 92
McClanahan, K. J., Maner, J. K., & Cheng, J. T. (2021) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672211042319 · Cited by 70
The impact of leader dominance on employees’ zero-sum mindset and helping behavior.
Kakkar, H., & Sivanathan, N. (2021) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000980 · Cited by 65
Self-citationInnovative work behavior through high-quality leadership
Miller, L. J., & Miller, A. F. (2020) · International Journal of Innovation Science · doi:10.1108/ijis-04-2019-0042 · Cited by 56
The Role of Economic Uncertainty in Rising Populism in the EU
Gözgör, G. (2020) · Public Choice · doi:10.1007/s11127-021-00933-7 · Cited by 68
Shepherd, S., Sherman, D. K., MacLean, A., & Kay, A. C. (2020) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620953096 · Cited by 69
No guts, no glory? How risk-taking shapes dominance, prestige, and leadership endorsement.
Kleef, G. A. V., Heerdink, M. W., Cheshin, A., Stamkou, E., Wanders, F., Koning, L. F., Fang, X., & Georgeac, O. (2021) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000868 · Cited by 53
Ronay, R., Maddux, W. W., & von Hippel, W. (2018) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.04.004 · Cited by 55
Botti, S., Iyengar, S. S., & McGill, A. L. (2022) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1325 · Cited by 56
Cheng, J. T., Gerpott, F. H., Benson, A. J., Bucker, B., Foulsham, T., Lansu, T. A. M., Schülke, O., & Tsuchiya, K. (2022) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2022.101654 · Cited by 57
Personality predictors of social status attainment
Grosz, M. P., Leckelt, M., & Back, M. D. (2019) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.023 · Cited by 49
Viva la evolution: Using dual-strategies theory to explain leadership in modern organizations
McClanahan, K. J. (2019) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101315 · Cited by 48
Ren, Z., Carton, A. M., Dimant, E., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2022) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101388 · Cited by 42
When size does matter: Dominance versus prestige based status signaling
Panchal, S., & Gill, T. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.047 · Cited by 50
Shifts in Support for Authoritarianism and Democracy in the Western Balkans
Lavrič, M., & Bieber, F. (2020) · Problems of Post-Communism · doi:10.1080/10758216.2020.1757468 · Cited by 45
Walls between groups: Self‐uncertainty, social identity, and intergroup leadership
Hogg, M. A. (2023) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12584 · Cited by 35
My way or the highway: High narcissism and low self‐esteem predict decreased support for democracy
Marchlewska, M., Castellanos, K. A., Lewczuk, K., Kofta, M., & Cichocka, A. K. (2018) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12290 · Cited by 34
Zeitzoff, T. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197679487.001.0001 · Cited by 33
Halevy, N., Halali, E., & Cohen, T. R. (2019) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000213 · Cited by 32
Ecology, culture and leadership: Theoretical integration and review
Lonati, S., & van Vugt, M. (2023) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2023.101749 · Cited by 38
Harsh but Expedient: Dominant Leaders Increase Group Cooperation via Threat of Punishment
Chen, F. X., Zhang, X., Laustsen, L., & Cheng, J. T. (2021) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976211031208 · Cited by 30
Roccato, M., Corbetta, P., Cavazza, N., & Colloca, P. (2019) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.12704 · Cited by 30
Leigh, A., & Desai, S. D. (2022) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2022.1629 · Cited by 32
Cook, A. S., Zill, A., & Meyer, B. M. (2019) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.05.003 · Cited by 29
Jachimowicz, J., & Weisman, H. (2022) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2022.100167 · Cited by 28
Compromise or choose: shared movement decisions in wild vulturine guineafowl
Papageorgiou, D., Nyaguthii, B., & Farine, D. R. (2024) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-024-05782-w · Cited by 27
Being a tough person in a tight world: Cultural tightness leads to a desire for muscularity
Chen, H., Wang, X., Zang, H., & Guinote, A. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104183 · Cited by 27
Sznycer, D. (2022) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2022.06.002 · Cited by 28
The triad model of follower needs: theory and review.
de Waal-Andrews, W., & van Vugt, M. (2020) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.006 · Cited by 23
The Status of Status Research: A Review of the Types, Functions, Levels, and Audiences
Prato, M., Ertug, G., Castellucci, F., & Zou, T.-J. (2024) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063241226918 · Cited by 22
How the Linguistic Styles of Donald Trump and Joe Biden Reflect Different Forms of Power
Körner, R., Overbeck, J. R., Körner, E., & Schütz, A. (2022) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x221085309 · Cited by 35
Sustainable Development and Populism
Kroll, C., & Zipperer, V. (2020) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106723 · Cited by 28
Political ideology and compensatory control mechanisms
de Leon, R. P., & Kay, A. C. (2020) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.02.013 · Cited by 23
Guillén, L., Jacquart, P., & Hogg, M. A. (2022) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672221086771 · Cited by 22
Kleef, G. A. V. (2023) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12745 · Cited by 23
How the economy shapes the way we think about ourselves and others
Bianchi, E. C. (2019) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.007 · Cited by 21
Nettle, D., & Saxe, R. R. (2021) · Collabra Psychology · doi:10.1525/collabra.28105 · Cited by 20
Chen, H., Wang, X., Zang, H., & Guinote, A. (2023) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672231169107 · Cited by 20
Stereotypes versus preferences: Revisiting the role of alpha males in leadership
Wiezel, A., Barlev, M., Martos, C. R., & Kenrick, D. T. (2024) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.01.001 · Cited by 27
Halevy, N., & Cohen, T. R. (2019) · Negotiation and Conflict Management Research · doi:10.1111/ncmr.12148 · Cited by 20
Third-party punishers do not compete to be chosen as partners in an experimental game
Batistoni, T., Barclay, P., & Raihani, N. (2022) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2021.1773 · Cited by 18
The Popularity of Authoritarian Leaders: A Cross-National InvestigationPreprint
Guriev, S. M., & Treisman, D. S. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2882915 · Cited by 18
Warlike and Peaceful Societies
Fog, A. (2017) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0128 · Cited by 16
McDermott, R., & Hatemi, P. (2018) · Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1177/1474704918764506 · Cited by 16
Actual Threat, Perceived Threat, and Authoritarianism: An Experimental Study
Russo, S., Roccato, M., & Merlone, U. (2020) · The Spanish Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1017/sjp.2020.7 · Cited by 16
Power motives, personality correlates, and leadership outcomes: A person‐centered approach
Li, Z., Lynch, J., Sun, T., Rizkyana, Q., Cheng, J. T., & Benson, A. J. (2023) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12882 · Cited by 15
Bland, A. M., & Swords, B. A. (2021) · Journal of Humanistic Psychology · doi:10.1177/00221678211010650 · Cited by 15
Dow, B. J., Wang, C. S., & Whitson, J. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104403 · Cited by 14
Economic Anxieties Undermine Support for Female (but Not Male) Political Candidates
Lei, R. F., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2018) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/asap.12150 · Cited by 13
Barling, J. I., Weatherhead, J. G., Pupco, S., Turner, N., & Montgomery, A. W. (2022) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/lodj-05-2021-0219 · Cited by 14
Rebels with a cause? How norm violations shape dominance, prestige, and influence granting
Kleef, G. A. V., Wanders, F., Vianen, A. E. M. V., Dunham, R. L., Du, X., & Homan, A. C. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0294019 · Cited by 13
Fos, P. J., Honoré, P. A., & Honoré, R. L. (2021) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.96304 · Cited by 13
Cheating at the Top: Trait Dominance Explains Dishonesty More Consistently Than Social Power
Kim, K., & Guinote, A. (2021) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672211051481 · Cited by 12
Economic assumptions and economic context: Implications for the study of leadership
Hiller, N. J., Piccolo, R. F., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2019) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101352 · Cited by 13
Forged at Workforce Entry? CEO Imprinting, Information Uncertainty and Merger Wave Timing
Fralich, R., & Ahmadsimab, A. (2023) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.13014 · Cited by 12
Gjoneska, B., Liuzza, M. T., Porciello, G., Caprara, G. V., & Aglioti, S. M. (2019) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.182023 · Cited by 14
Širola, N. (2020) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0124 · Cited by 12
When do people prefer dominant over prestigious political leaders?
Jiménez, Á. V., Flitton, A., & Mesoudi, A. (2021) · Evolutionary Human Sciences · doi:10.1017/ehs.2021.12 · Cited by 13
The fluctuation of pig prices and the identification of major drivers in China
Hua, J., Ding, J., Chen, Y., Kang, L., Zhang, H., & Zhang, J. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0313982 · Cited by 11
Laustsen, L., Sheng, X., Ahmad, M. G., Al-Shawaf, L., Banai, B., Banai, I. P., Barlev, M., Bastardoz, N., Bor, A., Cheng, J. T., et al. (2025) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2025.106674 · Cited by 11
Offord, M., Gill, R. C., & Kendal, J. R. (2019) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-018-0211-8 · Cited by 11
Pery, S., Doytch, G., & Kluger, A. N. (2020) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119554189.ch10 · Cited by 12
Stavrova, O., Ehlebracht, D., & Ren, D. (2023) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12685 · Cited by 10
Job insecurity, economic resources, and democratic backsliding: evidence from South Korea
Eom, J. H., & Kwon, H. Y. (2023) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2023.2287086 · Cited by 12
Reit, E. S., & Halevy, N. (2019) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.017 · Cited by 10
Rao, T., Yang, S., & Zhu, X. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19020932 · Cited by 9
Kakkar, H. (2024) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000380 · Cited by 8
Self-citationZhu, N., Chen, B., Lu, H. J., & Chang, L. (2021) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.111482 · Cited by 9
Hirsch, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Political Science · doi:10.3389/fpos.2022.929991 · Cited by 9
Brady, G. L., & Sivanathan, N. (2023) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2021.15640 · Cited by 9
Self-citationToo young to lead? Role incongruity explains age bias against young leaders
Daldrop, C., Homan, A. C., & Buengeler, C. (2025) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2025.101878 · Cited by 12
Explaining Putin’s impunity: public sector corruption and political trust in Russia
Zaloznaya, M., Glanville, J. L., & Reisinger, W. M. (2022) · Post-Soviet Affairs · doi:10.1080/1060586x.2022.2063633 · Cited by 8
Perilous and unaccountable: The positive relationship between dominance and moral hazard behaviors.
Brady, G. L., Kakkar, H., & Sivanathan, N. (2024) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000448 · Cited by 8
Self-citationZero-sum beliefs and the avoidance of political conversations
Boland, F. K., & Davidai, S. (2024) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-024-00095-4 · Cited by 11
Cheng, J. T., Dhaliwal, N. A., & Too, M. A. (2022) · Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology · doi:10.1007/s40750-022-00196-6 · Cited by 8
Sequeira, M., Afshordi, N., & Kajanus, A. (2024) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.05.005 · Cited by 7
Low competitive status elicits aggression in healthy young men: behavioural and neural evidence
Buades‐Rotger, M., Göttlich, M., Weiblen, R., Petereit, P., Scheidt, T., Keevil, B. G., & Krämer, U. M. (2021) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsab061 · Cited by 13
Leader-turn-follower: an opportunity for cooperation or sabotage?
Tanko, S., & Kwarteng, A. H. (2025) · Strategy and Leadership · doi:10.1108/sl-09-2025-0283 · Cited by 7
Let the people’s will prevail: Self-uncertainty and authoritarianism predict support for populism
Gøtzsche‐Astrup, O., & Hogg, M. A. (2023) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302231211291 · Cited by 6
Ideology and the Microfoundations of Conflict
Müller, V., & Gries, T. (2024) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197670187.001.0001 · Cited by 6
Economic cycles as a source of social influence on individuals
Širola, N. (2019) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12452 · Cited by 6
The Multi-Capital Leadership Theory
Garfield, Z. H., Rueden, C. R. V., & Hagen, E. H. (2025) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-025-09503-y · Cited by 5
Ronay, R., Oostrom, J. K., She, M. H. C., & Maner, J. K. (2023) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302231151942 · Cited by 5
Charafeddine, R., Castelain, T., & der Henst, J. V. (2023) · Cross-Cultural Research · doi:10.1177/10693971231202885 · Cited by 5
Mohamadpour, H., Navi, F. F. T., Asl, F. A., Heysieattalab, S., Shakeri, E., & Isheqlou, L. K. (2024) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2024.106177 · Cited by 5
Sainz, M., Moreno‐Bella, E., & Torres‐Vega, L. C. (2021) · International Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.5334/irsp.452 · Cited by 5
Can Policy Responses to Pandemics Reduce Mass Fear?
Bechtel, M. M., O’Brochta, W., & Tavits, M. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Political Science · doi:10.1017/xps.2022.7 · Cited by 8
Considering the role of second-order respect in individuals' deference to dominant actors
Reit, E. S., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104326 · Cited by 5
Kincaid, K. M., Angela, C., Rast, D. E., & Hogg, M. A. (2024) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/asap.12414 · Cited by 5
Fitzduff, M. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197512654.001.0001 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Kakkar, H., & Sivanathan, N.
- Affiliations
- London Business School (GB)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2017-06-12
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 6734-6739
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC5495227
- OpenAlex
- W2626998810
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12
- FWCI
- 21.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- London Business School Research Online (London Business School) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- leadership emergence, dominance, prestige, economic uncertainty, poverty, vacant housing, unemployment, perceived personal control, political support
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Leadership, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Social Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review