The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of object concepts in infancy: Evidence for early learning in an eye-tracking paradigm
Open accessAbstract
Concepts of objects as enduring and complete across space and time have been documented in infants within several months after birth, but little is known about how such concepts arise during development. Current theories that stress innate knowledge may neglect the potential contributions of experience to guide acquisition of object concepts. To examine whether learning plays an important role in early development of object representations, we used an eye-tracking paradigm with 4- and 6-month-old infants who were provided with an initial period of experience viewing an unoccluded trajectory, or no experience with this particular stimulus. After exposure to the unoccluded trajectory for only 2 min, there was a reliable increase in 4-month-old infants' anticipatory eye movement when the infants subsequently viewed occluded-trajectory displays, relative to 4-month-old infants who did not receive this experience. This effect of training in 4-month-old infants was found to generalize to another category of trajectory orientation. Older infants received no additional benefit from training, most likely because they enter the task capable of forming robust object representations under these conditions. This finding provides compelling evidence that very brief training facilitated formation of object representations, and suggests more generally that infants learn such representations from real-world experience viewing objects undergoing occlusion and disocclusion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The origins of intelligence in children.
Piaget, J. (1952) · doi:10.1037/11494-000 · Cited by 10,687
Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images
Olshausen, B. A., & Field, D. J. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381607a0 · Cited by 5,694
Roffwarg, H. P., Muzio, J. N., & Dement, W. C. (1966) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.152.3722.604 · Cited by 1,559
Visual statistical learning in infancy: evidence for a domain general learning mechanism
Kirkham, N. Z., Slemmer, J. A., & Johnson, S. P. (2002) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00004-5 · Cited by 1,072
Self-citation
Cited by
Beyond eye gaze: What else can eyetracking reveal about cognition and cognitive development?
Eckstein, M. K., Guerra-Carrillo, B., Miller Singley, A. T., & Bunge, S. A. (2017) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2016.11.001 · Cited by 686
Cognitive gains in 7-month-old bilingual infants
Kovács, Á. M., & Mehler, J. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0811323106 · Cited by 616
An action perspective on motor development
von Hofsten, C. (2004) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.04.002 · Cited by 465
How Do You Learn to Walk? Thousands of Steps and Dozens of Falls per Day
Adolph, K. E., Cole, W. G., Komati, M., Garciaguirre, J. S., Badaly, D., Lingeman, J. M., Chan, G. L. Y., & Sotsky, R. B. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612446346 · Cited by 419
Development of human visual function
Braddick, O., & Atkinson, J. (2011) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2011.02.018 · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, S. P., Amso, D., & Slemmer, J. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-08-25
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 10568-10573
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2092329166
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of object concepts in infancy: Evidence for early learning in an eye-tracking paradigm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1630655100
- The paper
- Johnson, S. P., Amso, D., & Slemmer, J. A. (2003). Development of object concepts in infancy: Evidence for early learning in an eye-tracking paradigm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1630655100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.