Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 686

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 221 of the 221 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Beyond eye gaze: What else can eyetracking reveal about cognition and cognitive development?

Open access
Eckstein, Maria K., Guerra-Carrillo, Belén, Miller Singley, Alison T., Bunge, Silvia A.·2017·Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

This review provides an introduction to two eyetracking measures that can be used to study cognitive development and plasticity: pupil dilation and spontaneous blink rate. We begin by outlining the rich history of gaze analysis, which can reveal the current focus of attention as well as cognitive strategies. We then turn to the two lesser-utilized ocular measures. Pupil dilation is modulated by the brain's locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system, which controls physiological arousal and attention, and has been used as a measure of subjective task difficulty, mental effort, and neural gain. Spontaneous eyeblink rate correlates with levels of dopamine in the central nervous system, and can reveal processes underlying learning and goal-directed behavior. Taken together, gaze, pupil dilation, and blink rate are three non-invasive and complementary measures of cognition with high temporal resolution and well-understood neural foundations. Here we review the neural foundations of pupil dilation and blink rate, provide examples of their usage, describe analytic methods and methodological considerations, and discuss their potential for research on learning, cognitive development, and plasticity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dcn.2016.11.001

Cites

221 of 221 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 221 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Al-Abdulmunem, 1999, Spontaneous blink rate of a normal population sample, Int. Contact Lens Clin., 26, 29, 10.1016/S0892-8967(99)00016-4 · doi:10.1016/s0892-8967(99)00016-4
  2. Book, 2008, Fusion of fMRI and the pupil response during an auditory oddball task, Presented at the Conference of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society
  3. Hallett, 2000, Clinical physiology of dopa dyskinesia, Ann. Neurol., 47
  4. Löwenstein, 1920, Experimentelle Beiträge zur Lehre von den katatonischen Pupillenveränderungen, Eur. Neurol., 47, 194, 10.1159/000190690 · doi:10.1159/000190690
  5. Schweitzer, 1956, Threshold measurements on the light reflex of the pupil in the dark adapted eye, Doc. Ophthalmol., 10, 10.1007/BF00172098 · doi:10.1007/bf00172098
  6. Wiseman, 2016, Blink and you’ll miss it: the role of blinking in the perception of magic tricks, PeerJ, 4, e1873, 10.7717/peerj.1873 · doi:10.7717/peerj.1873

Cited by

See all 686

Metadata

Authors
Eckstein, M. K., Guerra-Carrillo, B., Miller Singley, A. T., & Bunge, S. A.
Venue
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
25
Pages
69-91
ISSN
1878-9293 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2556086565
Cited by
686
References
221
FWCI
56.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2020-10-01)
Open access
gold
Licence
Funders
  • German Academic Exchange Service Doctoral Scholarship
  • National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation 21st Century Science Initiative Scholar Award in Understanding Human Cognition
  • Jacobs Foundation Advanced Career Research Fellowship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beyond eye gaze: What else can eyetracking reveal about cognition and cognitive development? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.dcn.2016.11.001
The paper
Eckstein, M. K., Guerra-Carrillo, B., Miller Singley, A. T., & Bunge, S. A. (2017). Beyond eye gaze: What else can eyetracking reveal about cognition and cognitive development? Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2016.11.001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.