The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of clinical drug efficacy by classification of drug-induced genomic expression profiles in vitro
Open accessAbstract
Assays of drug action typically evaluate biochemical activity. However, accurately matching therapeutic efficacy with biochemical activity is a challenge. High-content cellular assays seek to bridge this gap by capturing broad information about the cellular physiology of drug action. Here, we present a method of predicting the general therapeutic classes into which various psychoactive drugs fall, based on high-content statistical categorization of gene expression profiles induced by these drugs. When we used the classification tree and random forest supervised classification algorithms to analyze microarray data, we derived general “efficacy profiles” of biomarker gene expression that correlate with anti-depressant, antipsychotic and opioid drug action on primary human neurons in vitro . These profiles were used as predictive models to classify naïve in vitro drug treatments with 83.3% (random forest) and 88.9% (classification tree) accuracy. Thus, the detailed information contained in genomic expression data is sufficient to match the physiological effect of a novel drug at the cellular level with its clinical relevance. This capacity to identify therapeutic efficacy on the basis of gene expression signatures in vitro has potential utility in drug discovery and drug target validation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genomic Expression Programs in the Response of Yeast Cells to Environmental Changes
Gasch, A. P., Spellman, P. T., Kao, C. M., Carmel-Harel, O., Eisen, M. B., Storz, G., Botstein, D., & Brown, P. O. (2000) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.11.12.4241 · Cited by 4,815
Cited by
Strobl, C., Malley, J., & Tutz, G. (2009) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0016973 · Cited by 2,583
Multidimensional Drug Profiling By Automated Microscopy
Perlman, Z. E., Slack, M. D., Feng, Y., Mitchison, T. J., Wu, L. F., & Altschuler, S. J. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1100709 · Cited by 660
Redei, E. E., Andrus, B. M., Kwasny, M. J., Seok, J., Cai, X., Ho, J., & Mohr, D. C. (2014) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2014.66 · Cited by 83
Compound Classification Using Image‐Based Cellular Phenotypes
Adams, C. L., Kutsyy, V., Coleman, D. A., Cong, G., Crompton, A. M., Elias, K. A., Oestreicher, D. R., Trautman, J. K., & Vaisberg, E. (2006) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(06)14024-0 · Cited by 51
Mining mouse behavior for patterns predicting psychiatric drug classification
Kafkafi, N., Mayo, C. L., & Elmer, G. I. (2014) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-013-3230-6 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Gunther, E. C., Stone, D. J., Gerwien, R. W., Bento, P., & Heyes, M. P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-07-17
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 9608-9613
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1978005360
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of clinical drug efficacy by classification of drug-induced genomic expression profiles in vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1632587100
- The paper
- Gunther, E. C., Stone, D. J., Gerwien, R. W., Bento, P., & Heyes, M. P. (2003). Prediction of clinical drug efficacy by classification of drug-induced genomic expression profiles in vitro. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1632587100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.