Cited by 9Computational Drug Discovery MethodsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Mining mouse behavior for patterns predicting psychiatric drug classification

Open access
Kafkafi, Neri, Mayo, Cheryl L., Elmer, Greg I.·2014·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Rationale In psychiatric drug discovery, a critical step is predicting the psychopharmacological effect and therapeutic potential of novel (or repurposed) compounds early in the development process. This process is hampered by the need to utilize multiple disorder-specific and labor-intensive behavioral assays. Objectives This study aims to investigate the feasibility of a single high-throughput behavioral assay to classify psychiatric drugs into multiple psychopharmacological classes. Methods Using Pattern Array, a procedure for data mining exploratory behavior in mice, we mined ~100,000 complex movement patterns for those that best predict psychopharmacological class and dose. The best patterns were integrated into a classification model that assigns psychopharmacological compounds to one of six clinically relevant classes--antipsychotic, antidepressant, opioids, psychotomimetic, psychomotor stimulant, and α-adrenergic. Results Surprisingly, only a small number of well-chosen behaviors were required for successful class prediction. One of them, a behavior termed "universal drug detector", was dose-dependently decreased by drugs from all classes, thus providing a sensitive index of psychopharmacological activity. In independent validation in a blind fashion, simulating the process of in vivo pre-clinical drug screening, the classification model correctly classified nine out of 11 "unknown" compounds. Interestingly, even "misclassifications" match known alternate therapeutic indications, illustrating drug "repurposing" potential. Conclusions Unlike standard animal models, the discovered classification model can be systematically updated to improve its predictive power and add therapeutic classes and subclasses with each additional diversification of the database. Our study demonstrates the power of data mining approaches for behavior analysis, using multiple measures in parallel for drug screening and behavioral phenotyping.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-013-3230-6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Access to raw data facilitates text and automated data mining.

    “Access to raw data also facilitates text and automated data mining [246].”

    From Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0 (2020) · cites this paper as [246]

    The Abstract (Methods) describes mining mouse-behavior data for predictive patterns, supporting the automated data-mining part of the claim. Neither that passage nor the Introduction and Discussion passages addresses access to raw data or text mining, so the broader claim is not fully supported. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Agid Y Buzsáki G Diamond DM Frackowiak R Giedd J Girault JA Grace A Lambert JJ Manji H Mayberg H Popoli M Prochiantz A Richter-Levin G Somogyi P Spedding M Svenningsson P Weinberger D 2007 How can drug discovery for psychiatric disorders be improved? Nat Rev Drug Discov 6 189 201 10.1038/nrd2217 17330070 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Benjamini Y Lipkind D Horev G Fonio E Kafkafi Neri Golani I 2010 Ten ways to improve the quality of descriptions of whole-animal movement Neurosci Biobehav Rev 34 8 1351 1365 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.04.004 20399806 · DOI
  3. Braida D 2009 Potential anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like effects of salvinorin A, the main active ingredient of Salvia divinorum, in rodents Br J Pharmacol 157 844 853 19422370 PMC2721268
  4. Broom DC 2002 Convulsant activity of a non-peptidic delta-opioid receptor agonist is not required for its antidepressant-like effects in Sprague-Dawley rats Psychopharmacol (Berl) 164 42 48 12373418
  5. Brunner D Nestler E Leahy E 2002 In need of high-throughput behavioral systems Drug Discov Today 7 18 Suppl S107 S112 10.1016/S1359-6446(02)02423-6 12546875 · DOI
  6. Carlezon WA Jr 2006 Depressive-like effects of the kappa-opioid receptor agonist salvinorin A on behavior and neurochemistry in rats J Pharmacol Exp Ther 316 440 447 16223871
  7. Conn PJ Roth BL 2008 Opportunities and challenges of psychiatric drug discovery: roles for scientists in academic, industry, and government settings Neuropsychopharmacol 33 2048 2060 10.1038/sj.npp.1301638 18216778 · DOI
  8. Coryell W 1996 Psychotic depression J Clin Psychiatry 57 Suppl 3 27 31 discussion 49 8626367
  9. Crowley JJ Blendy JA Lucki I 2005 Strain-dependent antidepressant-like effects of citalopram in the mouse tail suspension test Psychopharmacology 183 257 264 10.1007/s00213-005-0166-5 16220334 · DOI
  10. Drai D Golani I 2001 SEE: a tool for the visualization and analysis of rodent exploratory behavior Neurosci Biobehav Rev 25 409 426 0.1016/S0149–7634(01)00022–7 11566479
  11. Dubovsky SL Thomas M 1992 Psychotic depression: advances in conceptualization and treatment Hosp Community Psychiatry 43 1189 1198 1360938
  12. Geyer MA Russo PV Masten VL 1986 Multivariate assessment of locomotor behavior: pharmacological and behavioral analyses Pharmaco Biochem Behav 25 1 277 88 2875472
  13. Golub TR 1999 Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring Science 286 531 537 10.1126/science.286.5439.531 10521349 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Gunther EC Stone DJ Gerwien RW Bento P Melvyn PH 2003 Prediction of clinical drug efficacy by classification of drug-induced genomic expression profiles in vitro Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100 9608 9613 10.1073/pnas.1632587100 12869696 PMC170965 · DOI
  15. Henry BL Minassian A Young J Paulus MP Geyer MA Perry W 2010 Cross-species assessments of motor and exploratory behavior related to bipolar disorder Neurosci Biobehav Rev 34 1296 1306 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.04.002 20398694 PMC2900445 · DOI
  16. Kafkafi N Elmer GI 2005a Texture of locomotor path: a replicable characterization of a complex behavioral phenotype Genes Brain Behav 4 7 431 443 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2005.00126.x 16176389 · DOI
  17. Kafkafi N Elmer GI 2005b Activity density in the open field: a measure for differentiating the effect of psychostimulants Pharmacol Biochem Behav 80 2 239 249 10.1016/j.pbb.2004.11.004 15680177 · DOI
  18. Kafkafi N Benjamini Y Sakov A Elmer GI Golani I 2005 Genotype-environment interactions in mouse behavior: a way out of the problem Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102 12 4619 4624 10.1073/pnas.0409554102 15764701 PMC555503 · DOI
  19. Kafkafi N Yekutieli D Yarowsky P Elmer GI 2008 Data mining in a behavioral test detects early symptoms in a model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis Behav Neurosci 122 4 777 787 10.1037/0735-7044.122.4.777 18729631 · DOI
  20. Kafkafi N Yekutieli D Elmer GI 2009 A data mining approach to in vivo classification of psychopharmacological drugs Neuropsychopharmacol 34 3 607 623 10.1038/npp.2008.103 18719620 · DOI
  21. Koenig JI Elmer GI Shepard PD Lee PR Mayo C Joy B Hercher E Brady DL 2005 Prenatal exposure to a repeated variable stress paradigm elicits behavioral and neuroendocrinological changes in the adult offspring: potential relevance to schizophrenia Behav Brain Res 156 2 251 61 15582111
  22. Nestler EJ Hynan SE 2010 Animal models of neuropsychiatric disorders Nature Neurosci 13 1161 1169 10.1038/nn.2647 20877280 PMC3750731 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Pangalos MN Schechter LE Hurko O 2007 Drug development for CNS disorders: strategies for balancing risk and reducing attrition Nat Rev Drug Discov 6 7 521 532 10.1038/nrd2094 17599084 · DOI
  24. Pataki CS Feinberg DT McGough JJ 2004 New drugs for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 9 293 302 15571486
  25. Petit-Demouliere B Chenu F Bourin M 2005 Forced swimming test in mice: a review of antidepressant activity Psychopharmacology 177 245 255 10.1007/s00213-004-2048-7 15609067 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Quan MN Zhang N Wang YY Zhang T Yang Z 2011 Possible antidepressant effects and mechanisms of memantine in behaviors and synaptic plasticity of a depression rat model Neurosci 182 88 97 21440043
  27. Rihel J 2010 Zebrafish behavioral profiling links drugs to biological targets and rest/wake regulation Science 327 5963 348 351 10.1126/science.1183090 20075256 PMC2830481 · DOI
  28. Schopp DT 2011 Where will new neuroscience therapies come from? Nat Rev Drug Discov 10 715 716 10.1038/nrd3559 21959271 · DOI
  29. Schreiber S Backer MM Pick CG 1999 The antinociceptive effect of venlafaxine in mice is mediated through opioid and adrenergic mechanisms Neurosci Lett 273 85 88 10505622
  30. Tan PN Steinbach M Kumar V 2006 Introduction to Data Mining Classification: basic concepts, decision trees and model evaluation Addison–Wesley Boston
  31. Tecott LH Nestler EJ 2004 Neurobehavioral assessment in the information age Nat Neurosci 7 462 466 10.1038/nn1225 15114359 · DOI
  32. Willner P 2005 Chronic mild stress (CMS) revisited: consistency and behavioural-neurobiological concordance in the effects of CMS Neuropsychobiology 52 2 90 110 10.1159/000087097 16037678 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kafkafi, N., Mayo, C. L., & Elmer, G. I.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
Kafkafi, Neri
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2013-08-20
Volume
231
Issue
1
Pages
231-242
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2027228291
Cited by
9
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA025647, R01DA025647)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
mouse behavior, movement pattern analysis, drug repurposing, antipsychotic drugs, antidepressants, opioids, psychostimulants, psychotomimetic drugs, behavioral phenotyping, drug screening
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Mental Disorders, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Feasibility Studies, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Models, Psychological, Motor Activity, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychotropic Drugs, Pharmaceutical Vehicles, Databases, Factual, Mice, Drug Discovery, Data Mining

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review