Cited by 48Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Three Cambrian fossils assembled into an extinct body plan of cnidarian affinity

Open access
Ou, Qiang, Han, Jian, Zhang, Zhifei, Shu, Degan, Sun, Ge, Mayer, Georg·2017·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance New material from the Chengjiang fossil Lagerstätte clarifies the identity of three early Cambrian problematica. The presumed earliest hemichordate Galeaplumosus abilus and the putative ancient sea pen Chengjiangopenna wangii are in fact fragments of Xianguangia sinica . Here we demonstrate that X. sinica possessed a polypoid body, a blind gastric cavity partitioned by septum-like structures, a holdfast that contained an additional cavity functioning as a hydroskeleton, a basal pit used for anchorage, and a radial whorl of feather-like tentacles for ciliary suspension feeding. Phylogenetic analyses based on the new findings suggest that X. sinica represents an extinct body plan most closely allied to cnidarians and thus sheds light on their early evolution.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1701650114

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pinnules are present on the proximal portion of the Xianguangia tentacle, extending into the 'column,' indicating that the 'column' is the basal part of the tentacles.

    “but we show here that pinnules are present on the proximal portion (Figures 1A, 1B, and 1E), extending into the “column,” indicating that the “column” is the basal part of the tentacles.”

    From Cambrian Sessile, Suspension Feeding Stem-Group Ctenophores and Evolution of the Comb Jelly Body Plan (2019) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Description (page unavailable) says the feather-like tentacles project from atop the column, with pinnules branching from each tentacle. The Emended Diagnosis (page unavailable) identifies the column as a trunk distinct from the tentacles, contrary to the claim that it is their basal portion. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These structures conform in dimensions to structures referred to as macrocilia in Xianguangia and striated structures in Siphusauctum.

    “conform in dimensions to structures referred to as macrocilia in Xianguangia [13”

    From Cambrian Sessile, Suspension Feeding Stem-Group Ctenophores and Evolution of the Comb Jelly Body Plan (2019) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that Xianguangia filaments are 19–23 μm thick and suggests they may resemble macrocilia. It does not call the Xianguangia structures macrocilia outright or establish that the citing paper’s structures conform to their dimensions. The citation is attached to Xianguangia, so this verdict does not assess the Siphusauctum comparison. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The pinnules of Xianguangia harbor dense distally oriented lineations or striations, 19-23 μm thick and up to 600 μm long, interpreted as compound cilia, more specifically macrocilia.

    “The pinnules harbor dense lineations or striations that are distally oriented (“Mci” in Figure 1D), 19–23 μm thick, and up to 600 μm long, which we interpret as compound cilia, more specifically macrocilia”

    From Cambrian Sessile, Suspension Feeding Stem-Group Ctenophores and Evolution of the Comb Jelly Body Plan (2019) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Description reports dense filaments on Xianguangia pinnules, 540–630 μm long; the Discussion interprets them as cilia 19–23 μm thick. It describes a macrocilia-like compound structure only as a possibility, with preservation-related thickening as an alternative. The Description says the filaments project nearly at right angles from the pinnules, not that they are distally oriented. No page numbers are provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This may be explained by mode of splitting or preservation, if the ciliary organs have separate membranes over each axoneme rather than a single membrane as proposed for "dinomischids".

    “This may be explained by mode of splitting or preservation, if the ciliary organs have separate membranes over each axoneme rather than a single membrane as proposed for “dinomischids” [13”

    From Cambrian Sessile, Suspension Feeding Stem-Group Ctenophores and Evolution of the Comb Jelly Body Plan (2019) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) suggests that preservation or diagenesis might explain the unusual thickness of the cilia in X. sinica. It does not discuss splitting or propose a single membrane around multiple axonemes in “dinomischids,” so it supports only the preservation-related part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Coelenterata has been recovered from morphological data.

    “Coelenterata (Figure 6) has been recovered from morphological data [13”

    From Cambrian Sessile, Suspension Feeding Stem-Group Ctenophores and Evolution of the Comb Jelly Body Plan (2019) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Discussion (page not available) says the fossil’s anatomy corresponds to coelenterates and reports a phylogenetic analysis based on 111 characters. But it says that analysis suggests the fossil was a stem-group cnidarian; it does not say the analysis recovered Coelenterata as a group. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [8]Chen JY, Hou XG, Lu HZ. Early Cambrian netted scale-bearing worm-like sea animal. Acta Palaeontologica Sin. 1989;28:12–27. [Google Scholar]
  2. [17]Shu DG, Conway Morris S. New diploblasts from Chengjiang fossil Lagerstätte. Earth Sci Front. 2006;13:227–233. [Google Scholar]
  3. [19]Seilacher A. Early multicellular life: Late Proterozoic fossils and the Cambrian explosion. In: Bengtson S, editor. Early Life on Earth (Nobel Symposium No. 84) Columbia Univ Press; New York: 1994. pp. 389–400. [Google Scholar]
  4. [20]Chen JY, Zhou GQ, Zhu MY, Ye GY. The Chengjiang Biota: A Unique Window on the Cambrian Explosion. National Museum of Natural Science; Taiwan: 1996. [Google Scholar]
  5. [22]Chen JY. The Dawn of Animal World. Jiangsu Science and Technology Press; Nanjing, China: 2004. p. 366. [Google Scholar]
  6. [24]Hou XG, et al. The Cambrian Fossils of Chengjiang, China: The Flowering of Early Animal Life. 2nd Ed. John Wiley & Sons; Oxford: 2017. p. 328. [Google Scholar]
  7. [26]Hou XG, Bergström J, Wang HF, Feng XH, Chen AL. The Chengjiang Fauna: Exceptionally Well-Preserved Animals from 530 Million Years Ago. Yunnan Science and Technology Press; Kunming, China: 1999. [Google Scholar]
  8. [36]Maletz J, Steiner M. Graptolite (Hemichordata, Pterobranchia) preservation and identification in the Cambrian Series 3. Palaeontology. 2015;58:1073–1107. [Google Scholar]
  9. [51]Hyman LH. The Invertebrates. McGraw Hill; New York: 1940. p. 726. [Google Scholar]
  10. [52]Brusca RC, Moore W, Shuster SM. Invertebrates. 3rd Ed. Sinauer Associates; Sunderland, MA: 2016. p. 1052. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ou, Q., Han, J., Zhang, Z., Shu, D., Sun, G., & Mayer, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Kassel (DE)
  • Northwest University (CN)
  • China University of Geosciences (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2017-07-31
Volume
114
Issue
33
Pages
8835-8840
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2739939815
Cited by
48
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung (1164230)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (41572017)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
Chengjiang Lagerstätte, cnidarian evolution, tentacles, phylogenetic analysis
MeSH terms
Animals, Cnidaria, Fossils

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review