Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 189

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Subretinal transplantation of genetically modified human cell lines attenuates loss of visual function in dystrophic rats

Open access
Lund, Raymond D., Adamson, Peter, Sauvé, Yves, Keegan, David J., Girman, Sergej V., Wang, Shaomei, Winton, Helen, Kanuga, Naheed, Kwan, Anthony S. L., Beauchène, Laurence, Zerbib, Anne, Hetherington, Len, Couraud, Pierre-Olivier, Coffey, Peter, Greenwood, John·2001·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Royal College of Surgeons rats are genetically predisposed to undergo significant visual loss caused by a primary dysfunction of retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells. By using this model, we have examined the efficacy of subretinal transplantation of two independent human RPE cell lines each exhibiting genetic modifications that confer long-term stability in vitro . The two cell lines, a spontaneously derived cell line (ARPE19) and an extensively characterized genetically engineered human RPE cell line (h1RPE7), which expresses SV40 large T (tumor) antigen, were evaluated separately. Both lines result in a significant preservation of visual function as assessed by either behavioral or physiological techniques. This attenuation of visual loss correlates with photoreceptor survival and the presence of donor cells in the areas of rescued photoreceptors at 5 months postgrafting (6 months of age). These results demonstrate the potential of genetically modified human RPE cells for ultimate application in therapeutic transplantation strategies for retinal degenerative diseases caused by RPE dysfunction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.171266298

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 189

Metadata

Authors
Lund, R. D., Adamson, P., Sauvé, Y., Keegan, D. J., Girman, S. V., Wang, S., Winton, H., Kanuga, N., Kwan, A. S. L., Beauchène, L., Zerbib, A., Hetherington, L., Couraud, P.-O., Coffey, P., & Greenwood, J.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2001-08-14
Volume
98
Issue
17
Pages
9942-9947
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2134421016
Cited by
189
References
3
FWCI
4.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Subretinal transplantation of genetically modified human cell lines attenuates loss of visual function in dystrophic rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.171266298
The paper
Lund, R. D., Adamson, P., Sauvé, Y., Keegan, D. J., Girman, S. V., Wang, S., Winton, H., Kanuga, N., Kwan, A. S. L., Beauchène, L., Zerbib, A., Hetherington, L., Couraud, P.-O., Coffey, P., & Greenwood, J. (2001). Subretinal transplantation of genetically modified human cell lines attenuates loss of visual function in dystrophic rats. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.171266298

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.