CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 131Social and Intergroup PsychologyReligion and Society InteractionsCultural Differences and Values

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Humans adapt to social diversity over time

Open access
Ramos, Miguel R., Bennett, Matthew R., Massey, Douglas S., Hewstone, Miles·2019·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1818884116PMC PMC6589669
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Significance: Changes in social diversity constitute a key factor shaping today’s world, yet scholarly work about the consequences of diversity has been marked by a critical lack of consensus. To address this concern, we propose a multidisciplinary approach where psychological, sociological, and evolutionary perspectives are integrated to provide an account of how individuals adapt to changes in social diversity. With an analysis of 22 y of worldwide data, our results suggest that humans are initially inclined to react negatively to threats to homogeneity, but that these negative effects are compensated in the long term by the beneficial effects of intergroup contact. Our findings advance knowledge and inform political debate about one of the defining challenges of modern societies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1818884116

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–131 of 131

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ramos, M. R., Bennett, M. R., Massey, D. S., & Hewstone, M.
Affiliations
  • Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (PT)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
National Academy of Sciences
Published
2019-05-09
Volume
116
Issue
25
Pages
12244-12249
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
DOI
10.1073/pnas.1818884116
PMC
PMC6589669
OpenAlex
W2944506469
Cited by
131
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7
FWCI
24.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.pnas.org/site/aboutpnas/licenses.xhtml (vor, 184 d)
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repositório do ISCTE-IUL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Marie Curie Fellowship (627982)
  • U.S. National Instiute of Child Health and Human Development (5P2CHD047879)
  • Nuffield Foundation (WEL/43108)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
social diversity, religious diversity, homogeneity, intergroup contact, trust, quality of life, globalization, intergroup relations, long-term adaptation
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Quality of Life, Religion, Social Behavior, Social Values, Time Factors, Cultural Diversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review