Cited by 138Human-Animal Interaction StudiesEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorMorphological variations and asymmetry

Evolution of facial muscle anatomy in dogs

Open access
Kaminski, Juliane, Waller, Bridget M., Diogo, Rui, Hartstone-Rose, Adam, Burrows, Anne M.·2019·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Dogs were shaped during the course of domestication both in their behavior and in their anatomical features. Here we show that domestication transformed the facial muscle anatomy of dogs specifically for facial communication with humans. A muscle responsible for raising the inner eyebrow intensely is uniformly present in dogs but not in wolves. Behavioral data show that dogs also produce the eyebrow movement significantly more often and with higher intensity than wolves do, with highest-intensity movements produced exclusively by dogs. Interestingly, this movement increases paedomorphism and resembles an expression humans produce when sad, so its production in dogs may trigger a nurturing response. We hypothesize that dogs’ expressive eyebrows are the result of selection based on humans’ preferences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1820653116

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaminski, J., Waller, B. M., Diogo, R., Hartstone-Rose, A., & Burrows, A. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Portsmouth (GB)
  • Howard University (US)
  • Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695;
  • Duquesne University (US)
Corresponding author
Kaminski, Juliane
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2019-06-17
Volume
116
Issue
29
Pages
14677-14681
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2950181455
Cited by
138
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 3
FWCI
10.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Howard (Howard University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
Keywords
dog domestication, facial muscle anatomy, eyebrow movements, facial communication, paedomorphosis, dog behavior, domestication syndrome
MeSH terms
Domestication, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Human-Animal Bond, Dogs, Eyebrows, Facial Expression, Facial Muscles, Female, Humans, Selection, Genetic, Wolves

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review