The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global imprint of mycorrhizal fungi on whole-plant nutrient economics
Open accessAbstract
Mycorrhizal fungi are critical members of the plant microbiome, forming a symbiosis with the roots of most plants on Earth. Most plant species partner with either arbuscular or ectomycorrhizal fungi, and these symbioses are thought to represent plant adaptations to fast and slow soil nutrient cycling rates. This generates a second hypothesis, that arbuscular and ectomycorrhizal plant species traits complement and reinforce these fungal strategies, resulting in nutrient acquisitive vs. conservative plant trait profiles. Here we analyzed 17,764 species level trait observations from 2,940 woody plant species to show that mycorrhizal plants differ systematically in nitrogen and phosphorus economic traits. Differences were clearest in temperate latitudes, where ectomycorrhizal plant species are more nitrogen use- and phosphorus use-conservative than arbuscular mycorrhizal species. This difference is reflected in both aboveground and belowground plant traits and is robust to controlling for evolutionary history, nitrogen fixation ability, deciduousness, latitude, and species climate niche. Furthermore, mycorrhizal effects are large and frequently similar to or greater in magnitude than the influence of plant nitrogen fixation ability or deciduous vs. evergreen leaf habit. Ectomycorrhizal plants are also more nitrogen conservative than arbuscular plants in boreal and tropical ecosystems, although differences in phosphorus use are less apparent outside temperate latitudes. Our findings bolster current theories of ecosystems rooted in mycorrhizal ecology and support the hypothesis that plant mycorrhizal association is linked to the evolution of plant nutrient economic strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
The worldwide leaf economics spectrum
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D. D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F., Cavender-Bares, J., Chapin, T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Diemer, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02403 · Cited by 9,021
The world‐wide ‘fast–slow’ plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto
Reich, P. B. (2014) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12211 · Cited by 4,000
Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea: How can it occur?
Vitousek, P., & Howarth, R. (1991) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/bf00002772 · Cited by 3,530
Phylogenetic Analysis and Comparative Data: A Test and Review of Evidence
Freckleton, R. P., Harvey, P. H., & Pagel, M. (2002) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/343873 · Cited by 2,604
Mycorrhizal ecology and evolution: the past, the present, and the future
van der Heijden, M. G. A., Martin, F. M., Selosse, M., & Sanders, I. R. (2015) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13288 · Cited by 2,205
Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude
Reich, P. B., & Oleksyn, J. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0403588101 · Cited by 2,125
Read, D. J. (1991) · Experientia · doi:10.1007/bf01972080 · Cited by 1,744
Mycorrhizas and nutrient cycling in ecosystems – a journey towards relevance?
Read, D. J., & Perez‐Moreno, J. (2003) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00704.x · Cited by 1,613
Roots and Associated Fungi Drive Long-Term Carbon Sequestration in Boreal Forest
Clemmensen, K. E., Bahr, A., Ovaskainen, O., Dahlberg, A., Ekblad, A., Wallander, H., Stenlid, J., Finlay, R. D., Wardle, D. A., & Lindahl, B. D. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231923 · Cited by 1,537
Cited by
A trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage under elevated CO2
Terrer, C., Phillips, R. P., Hungate, B. A., Rosende, J., Pett-Ridge, J., Craig, M. E., van Groenigen, K. J., Keenan, T. F., Sulman, B. N., Stocker, B. D., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03306-8 · Cited by 690
Metadata
- Authors
- Averill, C., Bhatnagar, J. M., Dietze, M. C., Pearse, W. D., & Kivlin, S. N.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2019-10-28
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 46
- Pages
- 23163-23168
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2982699620
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 19.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global imprint of mycorrhizal fungi on whole-plant nutrient economics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1906655116
- The paper
- Averill, C., Bhatnagar, J. M., Dietze, M. C., Pearse, W. D., & Kivlin, S. N. (2019). Global imprint of mycorrhizal fungi on whole-plant nutrient economics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1906655116
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.