The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The world‐wide ‘fast–slow’ plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto
Abstract
Summary: The leaf economics spectrum (LES) provides a useful framework for examining species strategies as shaped by their evolutionary history. However, that spectrum, as originally described, involved only two key resources (carbon and nutrients) and one of three economically important plant organs. Herein, I evaluate whether the economics spectrum idea can be broadly extended to water – the third key resource –stems, roots and entire plants and to individual, community and ecosystem scales. My overarching hypothesis is that strong selection along trait trade‐off axes, in tandem with biophysical constraints, results in convergence for any taxon on a uniformly fast, medium or slow strategy (i.e. rates of resource acquisition and processing) for all organs and all resources. Evidence for economic trait spectra exists for stems and roots as well as leaves, and for traits related to water as well as carbon and nutrients. These apply generally within and across scales (within and across communities, climate zones, biomes and lineages). There are linkages across organs and coupling among resources, resulting in an integrated whole‐plant economics spectrum. Species capable of moving water rapidly have low tissue density, short tissue life span and high rates of resource acquisition and flux at organ and individual scales. The reverse is true for species with the slow strategy. Different traits may be important in different conditions, but as being fast in one respect generally requires being fast in others, being fast or slow is a general feature of species. Economic traits influence performance and fitness consistent with trait‐based theory about underlying adaptive mechanisms. Traits help explain differences in growth and survival across resource gradients and thus help explain the distribution of species and the assembly of communities across light, water and nutrient gradients. Traits scale up – fast traits are associated with faster rates of ecosystem processes such as decomposition or primary productivity, and slow traits with slow process rates. Synthesis. Traits matter. A single ‘fast–slow’ plant economics spectrum that integrates across leaves, stems and roots is a key feature of the plant universe and helps to explain individual ecological strategies, community assembly processes and the functioning of ecosystems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The worldwide leaf economics spectrum
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D. D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F., Cavender-Bares, J., Chapin, T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Diemer, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02403 · Cited by 9,021
Self-citationGrime, J. P. (1977) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283244 · Cited by 5,754 · cited 3×
“Evidence for economic trait spectra exists for stems and roots as well as leaves, and for traits related to water as well as carbon and nutrients.”
BackgroundLavorel, S., & Garnier, E. (2002) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00664.x · Cited by 3,452
The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology
Cavender‐Bares, J., Kozak, K. H., Fine, P. V. A., & Kembel, S. W. (2009) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01314.x · Cited by 2,321
PLANT FUNCTIONAL MARKERS CAPTURE ECOSYSTEM PROPERTIES DURING SECONDARY SUCCESSION
Garnier, E., Cortez, J., Billès, G., Navas, M.-L., Roumet, C., Debussche, M., Laurent, G., Blanchard, A., Aubry, D., Bellmann, A., et al. (2004) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/03-0799 · Cited by 2,313
A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme
Westoby, M. (1998) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1004327224729 · Cited by 1,925 · cited 3×
“…and intertwined goals in ecology and evolution are to understand trade-offs that underpin ecological strategies and to identify attributes of species that are responsible for those trade-offs (Raunkiaer 1934; Grime 1979; Chapin 1980; Noble & Slatyer 1980; K€orner 2003; Westoby 1998; Craine 2009).”
BackgroundSUDING, K. N., LAVOREL, S., CHAPIN, F. S., CORNELISSEN, J. H. C., DÍAZ, S., GARNIER, E., GOLDBERG, D., HOOPER, D. U., JACKSON, S. T., & NAVAS, M. (2008) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01557.x · Cited by 1,285
Secondary succession and the pattern of plant dominance along experimental nitrogen gradients
Tilman, D. (1987) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937080 · Cited by 1,076 · cited 4×
“…differences between species indicative of capacity to pre-empt resources and reduce availability to competitors can explain the outcomes of competition between two or many species at a time (Tilman 1987; Tilman & Wedin 1991; Dybzinski & Tilman 2007; Dybzinski et al. 2011; Falster et al. 2011).”
BackgroundInfluentialImpacts of Biodiversity Loss Escalate Through Time as Redundancy Fades
Reich, P. B., Tilman, D., Isbell, F., Mueller, K., Hobbie, S. E., Flynn, D. F. B., & Eisenhauer, N. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1217909 · Cited by 897
Self-citationNutrient enrichment, biodiversity loss, and consequent declines in ecosystem productivity
Isbell, F., Reich, P. B., Tilman, D., Hobbie, S. E., Polasky, S., & Binder, S. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1310880110 · Cited by 712
Self-citation
Cited by
Vegetation demographics in Earth System Models: A review of progress and priorities
Fisher, R. A., Koven, C. D., Anderegg, W. R. L., Christoffersen, B. O., Dietze, M. C., Farrior, C. E., Holm, J. A., Hurtt, G. C., Knox, R. G., Lawrence, P. J., et al. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13910 · Cited by 768
Physiological and structural tradeoffs underlying the leaf economics spectrum
Onoda, Y., Wright, I. J., Evans, J. R., Hikosaka, K., Kitajima, K., Niinemets, Ü., Poorter, H., Tosens, T., & Westoby, M. (2017) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.14496 · Cited by 722
Global trait–environment relationships of plant communities
Bruelheide, H., Dengler, J., Purschke, O., Lenoir, J., Jiménez-Alfaro, B., Hennekens, S. M., Botta-Dukát, Z., Chytrý, M., Field, R., Jansen, F., et al. (2018) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-018-0699-8 · Cited by 614
Self-citationDrivers and mechanisms of tree mortality in moist tropical forests
McDowell, N., Allen, C. D., Anderson‐Teixeira, K., Brando, P., Brienen, R., Chambers, J., Christoffersen, B., Davies, S., Doughty, C., Duque, A., et al. (2018) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.15027 · Cited by 597
Roumet, C., Birouste, M., Picon‐Cochard, C., Ghestem, M., Osman, N., Vrignon‐Brenas, S., Cao, K., & Stokes, A. (2016) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13828 · Cited by 566
Metadata
- Authors
- Reich, P. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-02-19
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 275-301
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2745
- OpenAlex
- W2127928904
- Cited by
- 4,000
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 142.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The world‐wide ‘fast–slow’ plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1365-2745.12211
- The paper
- Reich, P. B. (2014). The world‐wide ‘fast–slow’ plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12211
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.