Cited by 194Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesPeripheral Neuropathies and DisordersPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis

Inflammation-related plasma and CSF biomarkers for multiple sclerosis

Open access
Huang, Jesse, Khademi, Mohsen, Fugger, Lars, Lindhe, Örjan, Novakova, Lenka, Axelsson, Markus, Malmeström, Clas, Constantinescu, Clara +4 more·2020·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Effective biomarkers for multiple sclerosis diagnosis, assessment of prognosis, and treatment responses, in particular those measurable in blood, are largely lacking. We have investigated a broad set of protein biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma using a highly sensitive proteomic immunoassay. Cases from two independent cohorts were compared with healthy controls and patients with other neurological diseases. We identified and replicated 10 cerebrospinal fluid proteins including IL-12B, CD5, MIP-1a, and CXCL9 which had a combined diagnostic efficacy similar to immunoglobulin G (IgG) index and neurofilament light chain (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.95). Two plasma proteins, OSM and HGF, were also associated with multiple sclerosis in comparison to healthy controls. Sensitivity and specificity of combined CSF and plasma markers for multiple sclerosis were 85.7% and 73.5%, respectively. In the discovery cohort, eotaxin-1 (CCL11) was associated with disease duration particularly in patients who had secondary progressive disease ( P CSF < 4 × 10 −5 , P plasma < 4 × 10 −5 ), and plasma CCL20 was associated with disease severity ( P = 4 × 10 −5 ), although both require further validation. Treatment with natalizumab and fingolimod showed different compartmental changes in protein levels of CSF and peripheral blood, respectively, including many disease-associated markers (e.g., IL12B, CD5) showing potential application for both diagnosing disease and monitoring treatment efficacy. We report a number of multiple sclerosis biomarkers in CSF and plasma for early disease detection and potential indicators for disease activity. Of particular importance is the set of markers discovered in blood, where validated biomarkers are lacking.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1912839117

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • OPCs have been suggested to express the primary CCL11 receptor CCR3, and elevated CCL11 levels are associated with MS disease duration and severity.

    “Moreover, OPCs have been suggested to express the primary CCL11 receptor, CCR360 and elevated CCL11 levels are associated with MS disease duration and severity61,62.”

    From Senescent-like microglia limit remyelination through the senescence associated secretory phenotype (2025) · cites this paper as [62]

    The Results section on clinical course reports that CCL11 increased with MS disease duration and showed a suggestive increase in secondary progressive versus relapsing–remitting disease. It does not report an association between CCL11 and measured disease severity; the Results and Discussion instead identify CCL20 as associated with severity. The separate CCR3 statement is attached to citation 60, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. [1]Thompson A. J.., Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol. 17, 162– 173 (2018). 29275977
  2. [4]Filippi M.., Multiple sclerosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 4, 43 (2018). 30410033
  3. [5]Olsson T.., Autoreactive T lymphocytes in multiple sclerosis determined by antigen-induced secretion of interferon-gamma. J. Clin. Invest. 86, 981– 985 (1990). 1697609 PMC296818
  4. [7]Hohlfeld R., Dornmair K., Meinl E., Wekerle H., The search for the target antigens of multiple sclerosis, part 1: Autoreactive CD4+ T lymphocytes as pathogenic effectors and therapeutic targets. Lancet Neurol. 15, 198– 209 (2016). 26724103
  5. [8]Correale J., Fiol M., Chitinase effects on immune cell response in neuromyelitis optica and multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 17, 521– 531 (2011). 21159721
  6. [9]Lycke J., Zetterberg H., The role of blood and CSF biomarkers in the evaluation of new treatments against multiple sclerosis. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 13, 1143– 1153 (2017). 29090607
  7. [10]Khademi M.., Intense inflammation and nerve damage in early multiple sclerosis subsides at older age: A reflection by cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers. PLoS One 8, e63172 (2013). 23667585 PMC3646751
  8. [11]Lycke J. N., Karlsson J. E., Andersen O., Rosengren L. E., Neurofilament protein in cerebrospinal fluid: A potential marker of activity in multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 64, 402– 404 (1998). 9527161 PMC2170011
  9. [12]Khademi M.., Cerebrospinal fluid CXCL13 in multiple sclerosis: A suggestive prognostic marker for the disease course. Mult. Scler. 17, 335– 343 (2011). 21135023
  10. [13]Teunissen C. E., Malekzadeh A., Leurs C., Bridel C., Killestein J., Body fluid biomarkers for multiple sclerosis–The long road to clinical application. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 11, 585– 596 (2015). 26392381
  11. [14]Hartmann F. J.., Multiple sclerosis-associated IL2RA polymorphism controls GM-CSF production in human TH cells. Nat. Commun. 5, 5056 (2014). 25278028
  12. [15]Kuhle J.., Serum neurofilament is associated with progression of brain atrophy and disability in early MS. Neurology 88, 826– 831 (2017). 28148632 PMC5331872
  13. [16]Piehl F.., Plasma neurofilament light chain levels in patients with MS switching from injectable therapies to fingolimod. Mult. Scler. 24, 1046– 1054 (2018). 28627962
  14. [17]Assarsson E.., Homogenous 96-plex PEA immunoassay exhibiting high sensitivity, specificity, and excellent scalability. PLoS One 9, e95192 (2014). 24755770 PMC3995906
  15. [18]Polman C. H..; AFFIRM Investigators, A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 354, 899– 910 (2006). 16510744
  16. [19]Kappos L..; FREEDOMS Study Group, A placebo-controlled trial of oral fingolimod in relapsing multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 362, 387– 401 (2010). 20089952
  17. [20]Huang J., Khademi M., Piehl F., Olsson T., Kockum I., Inflammation protein levels in plasma and CSF samples from patients with multiple sclerosis, other neurological disease and controls. Swedish National Dataservice. 10.5878/p6dc-8149. Deposited 22 April 2020. · DOI
  18. [21]Novalova L., Axelsson M., Malmeström C., Constantinescu C., Lycke J., Inflammation protein levels in plasma and CSF samples from pateints with multiple sclerosis, other neurological disease and controls. Swedish National Dataservice. 10.5878/ta78-gb12. Deposited 23 April 2020. · DOI
  19. [23]Roxburgh R. H.., Multiple sclerosis severity score: Using disability and disease duration to rate disease severity. Neurology 64, 1144– 1151 (2005). 15824338
  20. [24]Manouchehrinia A.., Age related multiple sclerosis severity score: Disability ranked by age. Mult. Scler. 23, 1938– 1946 (2017). 28155580 PMC5700773
  21. [25]Huang J., Khademi M., Piehl F., Olsson T., Kockum I., Inflammation protein levels in plasma and CSF samples from patients with multiple sclerosis, other neurological disease and controls. 10.5878/2ver-wy19. Swedish National Dataservice. Deposited 23 April 2020. · DOI
  22. [26]Mazzi V., Cytokines and chemokines in multiple sclerosis. Clin. Ter. 166, e62– e66 (2015). 25756269
  23. [27]Olsson T., Cytokine-producing cells in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis. Neurology 45 (suppl. 6), S11– S15 (1995). 7540264
  24. [28]Balashov K. E., Rottman J. B., Weiner H. L., Hancock W. W., CCR5(+) and CXCR3(+) T cells are increased in multiple sclerosis and their ligands MIP-1alpha and IP-10 are expressed in demyelinating brain lesions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 6873– 6878 (1999). 10359806 PMC22009
  25. [29]Misu T.., Chemokine receptor expression on T cells in blood and cerebrospinal fluid at relapse and remission of multiple sclerosis: Imbalance of Th1/Th2-associated chemokine signaling. J. Neuroimmunol. 114, 207– 212 (2001). 11240033
  26. [30]Sørensen T. L.., Expression of specific chemokines and chemokine receptors in the central nervous system of multiple sclerosis patients. J. Clin. Invest. 103, 807– 815 (1999). 10079101 PMC408141
  27. [31]Beecham A. H..; International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium (IMSGC); Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 2 (WTCCC2); International IBD Genetics Consortium (IIBDGC), Analysis of immune-related loci identifies 48 new susceptibility variants for multiple sclerosis. Nat. Genet. 45, 1353– 1360 (2013). 24076602 PMC3832895
  28. [32]Ruprecht K.., Effects of oncostatin M on human cerebral endothelial cells and expression in inflammatory brain lesions. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 60, 1087– 1098 (2001). 11706938
  29. [33]Takata F.., Oncostatin M-induced blood-brain barrier impairment is due to prolonged activation of STAT3 signaling in vitro. J. Cell. Biochem. 119, 9055– 9063 (2018). 30076740
  30. [34]Houben E., Hellings N., Broux B., Oncostatin M, an underestimated player in the central nervous system. Front. Immunol. 10, 1165 (2019). 31191538 PMC6549448
  31. [35]Bai L.., Hepatocyte growth factor mediates mesenchymal stem cell–induced recovery in multiple sclerosis models. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 862– 870 (2012). 22610068 PMC3427471
  32. [36]McCoy A. T.., Evaluation of metabolically stabilized angiotensin IV analogs as procognitive/antidementia agents. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 344, 141– 154 (2013). 23055539 PMC3533412
  33. [37]Hill L. J.., Cystatin D (CST5): An ultra-early inflammatory biomarker of traumatic brain injury. Sci. Rep. 7, 5002 (2017). 28694499 PMC5504020
  34. [38]Comabella M.., Cerebrospinal fluid chitinase 3-like 1 levels are associated with conversion to multiple sclerosis. Brain 133, 1082– 1093 (2010). 20237129
  35. [39]Lucchinetti C. F.., A role for humoral mechanisms in the pathogenesis of Devic’s neuromyelitis optica. Brain 125, 1450– 1461 (2002). 12076996 PMC5444467
  36. [40]Adzemovic M. Z.., Expression of Ccl11 associates with immune response modulation and protection against neuroinflammation in rats. PLoS One 7, e39794 (2012). 22815714 PMC3397980
  37. [41]Arima Y.., Regional neural activation defines a gateway for autoreactive T cells to cross the blood-brain barrier. Cell 148, 447– 457 (2012). 22304915
  38. [43]Shen Q.., Strong impact on plasma protein profiles by precentrifugation delay but not by repeated freeze-thaw cycles, as analyzed using multiplex proximity extension assays. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 56, 582– 594 (2018). 29040064
  39. [44]Tworoger S. S., Hankinson S. E., Collection, processing, and storage of biological samples in epidemiologic studies: Sex hormones, carotenoids, inflammatory markers, and proteomics as examples. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 15, 1578– 1581 (2006). 16985015
  40. [45]Mellergård J., Edström M., Vrethem M., Ernerudh J., Dahle C., Natalizumab treatment in multiple sclerosis: Marked decline of chemokines and cytokines in cerebrospinal fluid. Mult. Scler. 16, 208– 217 (2010). 20007431
  41. [46]Novakova L.., Searching for neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis at clinical onset: Diagnostic value of biomarkers. PLoS One 13, e0194828 (2018). 29614113 PMC5882126

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, J., Khademi, M., Fugger, L., Lindhe, Ö., Novakova, L., Axelsson, M., Malmeström, C., Constantinescu, C., Lycke, J., Piehl, F., Olsson, T., & Kockum, I.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
  • Olink Bioscience (Sweden) (SE)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
Corresponding author
Kockum, Ingrid
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2020-05-26
Volume
117
Issue
23
Pages
12952-12960
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W3032082124
Cited by
194
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 7
FWCI
16.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Vetenskapsrådet (2015-02419)
  • Hjärnfonden (NA)
  • OLINK's Young Scientist Competition (NA)
  • MS Forsknings Fonden (NA)
  • Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada (EGID:3045)
  • Swedish Federal Government (ALFGBG-722081)
  • Swedish Association of Persons with Neurological Disabilities (NA)
  • Research Foundation of the Multiple Sclerosis Society of Gothenburg (NA)
  • Edit Jacobson Foundation (NA)
  • EC | Horizon 2020 (733161)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, biomarkers, cerebrospinal fluid protein, plasma proteins, inflammation, IL12B, CD5, macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha, CXCL9, OSM, hepatocyte growth factor, eotaxin, CCL20, natalizumab, fingolimod, treatment response monitoring, early disease detection, disease severity, disease duration
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Inflammation, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Prognosis, Severity of Illness Index, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Biomarkers, Case-Control Studies, Proteomics, Chemokine CCL11, Chemokine CCL20, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review