Cited by 19Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

The role of neurofilament light in genetic frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Open access
Zetterberg, Henrik, Teunissen, Charlotte, van Swieten, John, Kuhle, Jens, Boxer, Adam, Rohrer, Jonathan D, Mitic, Laura, Nicholson, Alexandra M +3 more·2022·Brain Communications

Abstract

Genetic frontotemporal lobar degeneration caused by autosomal dominant gene mutations provides an opportunity for targeted drug development in a highly complex and clinically heterogeneous dementia. These neurodegenerative disorders can affect adults in their middle years, progress quickly relative to other dementias, are uniformly fatal and have no approved disease-modifying treatments. Frontotemporal dementia, caused by mutations in the GRN gene which encodes the protein progranulin, is an active area of interventional drug trials that are testing multiple strategies to restore progranulin protein deficiency. These and other trials are also examining neurofilament light as a potential biomarker of disease activity and disease progression and as a therapeutic endpoint based on the assumption that cerebrospinal fluid and blood neurofilament light levels are a surrogate for neuroaxonal damage. Reports from genetic frontotemporal dementia longitudinal studies indicate that elevated concentrations of blood neurofilament light reflect disease severity and are associated with faster brain atrophy. To better inform patient stratification and treatment response in current and upcoming clinical trials, a more nuanced interpretation of neurofilament light as a biomarker of neurodegeneration is now required, one that takes into account its relationship to other pathophysiological and topographic biomarkers of disease progression from early presymptomatic to later clinically symptomatic stages.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/braincomms/fcac310

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Due to its prognostic utility, NfL measures may additionally improve clinical trial design by enabling the well-balanced stratification of slow and fast progressors across treatment arms, thereby decreasing treatment outcome variability.

    “Due to its prognostic utility, NfL measures may additionally improve clinical trial design by enabling the well-balanced stratification of slow and fast progressors across treatment arms, thereby decreasing treatment outcome variability [65, 66].”

    From Comprehensive cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons of plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein and neurofilament light across FTD spectrum disorders (2025) · cites this paper as [65]

    The sections on NfL as a pharmacodynamic marker and on summary recommendations (pages not provided) describe NfL as potentially useful for distinguishing fast from slow progressors and for patient stratification in trials. They do not say that stratification would balance progressors across treatment arms or decrease treatment-outcome variability. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 97 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [30]Bjartmar C, Kidd G, Mork S, Rudick R, Trapp BD. Neurological disability correlates with spinal cord axonal loss and reduced N-acetyl aspartate in chronic multiple sclerosis patients. Ann Neurol. 2000; 48(6): 893– 901. 11117546

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zetterberg, H., Teunissen, C., van Swieten, J., Kuhle, J., Boxer, A., Rohrer, J. D., Mitic, L., Nicholson, A. M., Pearlman, R., McCaughey, S. M., & Tatton, N.
Affiliations
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
  • Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Center , Rotterdam , the Netherlands
  • Department of Clinical Research, Department of Neurology, Department of Biomedicine, Multiple Sclerosis Centre, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel , Basel , Switzerland
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • UK Dementia Research Institute (GB)
  • Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
  • The Bluefield Project to Cure FTD , San Francisco, CA , USA
  • Alector (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Tatton, Nadine
Venue
Brain Communications
Published
2022-11-26
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
fcac310-fcac310
ISSN
2632-1297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4309975195
Cited by
19
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Alector, Inc
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
neurofilament light chain, frontotemporal dementia, progranulin, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, disease progression, brain atrophy, presymptomatic disease, patient stratification, clinical trial endpoints

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review