Cited by 42Silk-based biomaterials and applicationsNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

Photo–cross-linkable, insulating silk fibroin for bioelectronics with enhanced cell affinity

Open access
Ju, Jie, Hu, Ning, Cairns, Dana M., Liu, Haitao, Timko, Brian P.·2020·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Significance: Recent advances in bioelectronics have opened avenues toward hybrid engineered tissues with embedded devices that could monitor, modulate, or otherwise augment cellular function. In order to achieve these “cyborgs,” however, both devices and electronic interconnects must stably integrate with the surrounding tissue. We investigated a photo–cross-linkable silk fibroin (PSF) derivative that could be selectively cross-linked using conventional photolithography. We found that PSF was an ideal candidate for bioelectronic scaffolds: it was electrically insulating and so could passivate electronic interconnects, presented amenable surface chemistry to promote cellular adhesion, and could be realized as freestanding, three-dimensional constructs. PSF-based scaffolds are compatible with a wide variety of devices and tissues, and so could enable new classes of hybrid systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2003696117

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ju, J., Hu, N., Cairns, D. M., Liu, H., & Timko, B. P.
Affiliations
Tufts University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2020-06-22
Volume
117
Issue
27
Pages
15482-15489
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W3036614133
Cited by
42
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Tufts University (Tufts Collaborates, Research Advancement Fund)
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (P41 EB002520)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (2190050415)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Keywords
silk fibroin, microelectrode arrays, neuron adhesion, surface charge, poly-D-lysine, brain slices
MeSH terms
Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Bioelectric Energy Sources, Brain, Cell Adhesion, Cell Line, Female, Fibroins, Heart, Materials Testing, Ultraviolet Rays, Tissue Engineering, Mice, Tissue Scaffolds, Neural Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review