The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reprogramming of primordial germ cells begins before migration into the genital ridge, making these cells inadequate donors for reproductive cloning
Open accessAbstract
Germ cells undergo epigenetic modifications as they develop, which suggests that they may be ideal donors for nuclear transfer (cloning). In this study, nuclei from confirmed embryonic germ cells were used as donors to determine whether they are competent for cloning and at which stage they are most competent. Embryos cloned from migrating 10.5-days-postcoitum (dpc) primordial germ cells (PGCs) showed normal morphological development to midgestation but died shortly thereafter. In contrast, embryos cloned from later-stage germ cells were developmentally delayed at midgestation. Thus, donor germ cell age inversely correlated with the developmental stage attained by cloned embryos. The methylation status of the H19 - and Snrpn -imprinting control regions in germ cell clones paralleled that of the donors, and revealed that demethylation, or erasure of imprints, was already initiated in PGCs at 10.5 dpc and was complete by 13.5 dpc. Similarly, clones derived from male 15.5-dpc germ cells showed increased methylation correlating with the initiation of de novo methylation that resets imprints at this stage, and clones from neonatal germ cells showed nearly complete methylation in the H19 imprinting control region. These results indicate that the epigenetic state of the donor nucleus is retained in cloned embryos, and that germ cells are therefore inadequate nuclear donors for cloning because they are either erasing or resetting epigenetic patterns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Epigenetic Reprogramming in Mammalian Development
Reik, W., Dean, W., & Walter, J. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1063443 · Cited by 3,078
Cited by
The Dynamics of Genome-wide DNA Methylation Reprogramming in Mouse Primordial Germ Cells
Seisenberger, S., Andrews, S., Krueger, F., Arand, J., Walter, J., Santos, F., Popp, C., Thienpont, B., Dean, W., & Reik, W. (2012) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.11.001 · Cited by 973
Babenko, O., Kovalchuk, I., & Metz, G. A. S. (2015) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.11.013 · Cited by 513
Epigenetic Transgenerational Actions of Endocrine Disruptors
Anway, M. D., & Skinner, M. K. (2006) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/en.2005-1058 · Cited by 455
Faulk, C., & Dolinoy, D. C. (2011) · Epigenetics · doi:10.4161/epi.6.7.16209 · Cited by 386
Jiang, Y.-H., Bressler, J., & Beaudet, A. L. (2004) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genom.5.061903.180014 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Yamazaki, Y., Mann, M. R. W., Lee, S. S., Marh, J., McCarrey, J. R., Yanagimachi, R., & Bartolomei, M. S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-09-23
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 12207-12212
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2148019658
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reprogramming of primordial germ cells begins before migration into the genital ridge, making these cells inadequate donors for reproductive cloning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.2035119100
- The paper
- Yamazaki, Y., Mann, M. R. W., Lee, S. S., Marh, J., McCarrey, J. R., Yanagimachi, R., & Bartolomei, M. S. (2003). Reprogramming of primordial germ cells begins before migration into the genital ridge, making these cells inadequate donors for reproductive cloning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2035119100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.