Cited by 40

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Advanced age increases frequencies of de novo mitochondrial mutations in macaque oocytes and somatic tissues

Arbeithuber, Barbara, Cremona, Marzia A., Hester, James, Barrett, Alison, Higgins, Bonnie, Anthony, Kate, Chiaromonte, Francesca, Diaz, Francisco J., Makova, Kateryna D.·2022·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Multiple human genetic diseases are caused by mutations in the maternally transmitted DNA of mitochondria, the powerhouses of the cell. It is important to study how these mutations arise and accumulate with age, especially because humans in many societies now choose to have children at an older age. However, this is difficult to accomplish in humans, particularly for female germline cells, oocytes. To overcome this limitation, we studied mitochondrial mutation origins and accumulation with age in a primate model species, rhesus macaque. We found that new mutations accumulate the fastest in metabolically active liver and the slowest in oocytes. Thus, primate oocytes might have developed a mechanism to protect their mitochondrial DNA from excessive mutations, allowing reproduction later in life.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2118740119

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1. Age-related increase in mutation frequency. (A) Liver, muscle, and oocyte samples were sequenced from 1- to 23-y-old macaques, classified into four age groups: young, intermediate 1, intermediate 2, and old. (B) Mixed-effects linear model analyzing the effect of age on mutation frequencies (a piecewise model was used for oocytes). Curves show the predicted mutation frequency based on the fixed-effect part of the model. Dots are the observed mutation frequencies per tissue per macaque; predicted frequencies and bootstrap confidence intervals are in SI Appendix, Fig. S5B. (C) Mutation frequencies measured in liver, muscle, and single oocytes shown for each macaque and for each age group. The average mutation frequency among oocytes analyzed for an animal was calculated; the results did not change qualitatively when each oocyte was considered individually (SI Appendix, Table S3 and Fig. S6). P values are for a permutation test comparing young and old age groups (one-sided test based on medians; 10,000 permutations; corrected for multiple testing, see Materials and Methods). (D) Tissue-specific mutation frequencies (i.e., total number of tissue-specific mutations divided by the product of mtDNA region length and mean DCS depth) for each age group in protein-coding (11,370 bp), rRNA (2,505 bp), tRNA (1,504 bp), D-loop (1085 bp), and OriL (33 bp; including a 3-bp overlap with tRNA) sequences. Mutation frequencies for noncoding sequences outside of the D-loop and OriL (98 bp) are shown in SI Appendix, Table S6. Mutation frequency bars are shown with 95% Poisson confidence intervals.
Fig. 1. Age-related increase in mutation frequency. (A) Liver, muscle, and oocyte samples were sequenced from 1- to 23-y-old macaques, classified into four age groups: young, intermediate 1, intermediate 2, and old. (B) Mixed-effects linear model analyzing the effect of age on mutation frequencies (a piecewise model was used for oocytes). Curves show the predicted mutation frequency based on the fixed-effect part of the model. Dots are the observed mutation frequencies per tissue per macaque; predicted frequencies and bootstrap confidence intervals are in SI Appendix, Fig. S5B. (C) Mutation frequencies measured in liver, muscle, and single oocytes shown for each macaque and for each age group. The average mutation frequency among oocytes analyzed for an animal was calculated; the results did not change qualitatively when each oocyte was considered individually (SI Appendix, Table S3 and Fig. S6). P values are for a permutation test comparing young and old age groups (one-sided test based on medians; 10,000 permutations; corrected for multiple testing, see Materials and Methods). (D) Tissue-specific mutation frequencies (i.e., total number of tissue-specific mutations divided by the product of mtDNA region length and mean DCS depth) for each age group in protein-coding (11,370 bp), rRNA (2,505 bp), tRNA (1,504 bp), D-loop (1085 bp), and OriL (33 bp; including a 3-bp overlap with tRNA) sequences. Mutation frequencies for noncoding sequences outside of the D-loop and OriL (98 bp) are shown in SI Appendix, Table S6. Mutation frequency bars are shown with 95% Poisson confidence intervals.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 2. Analysis of variant hotspots. (A) The observed and expected distributions of the number of macaques with individual variants in liver, muscle, and oocytes (with all oocytes from an animal considered together). (B) Distribution of mutations (normalized by the length of the respective region) among D-loop, OriL, noncoding DNA outside of OriL and D-loop, protein-coding regions, rRNA, and tRNA, shown separately for each tissue, and for mutations observed in 1–2, 3–4, or >4 macaques. Numbers indicate the total number of mutations analyzed (due to overlapping annotation of regions, some mutations were counted twice). The proportion of mtDNA occupied by each region is shown on the right. (C) Hairpin structure of OriL; variant hotspots are in blue. (D) hN/hS ratios for mutations observed in 1–2, 3–4, or >4 macaques. Numbers indicate the total number of mutations analyzed. In muscle of intermediate 2 animals, we did not find any synonymous mutations and, thus, could not compute the hN/hS ratio.
Fig. 2. Analysis of variant hotspots. (A) The observed and expected distributions of the number of macaques with individual variants in liver, muscle, and oocytes (with all oocytes from an animal considered together). (B) Distribution of mutations (normalized by the length of the respective region) among D-loop, OriL, noncoding DNA outside of OriL and D-loop, protein-coding regions, rRNA, and tRNA, shown separately for each tissue, and for mutations observed in 1–2, 3–4, or >4 macaques. Numbers indicate the total number of mutations analyzed (due to overlapping annotation of regions, some mutations were counted twice). The proportion of mtDNA occupied by each region is shown on the right. (C) Hairpin structure of OriL; variant hotspots are in blue. (D) hN/hS ratios for mutations observed in 1–2, 3–4, or >4 macaques. Numbers indicate the total number of mutations analyzed. In muscle of intermediate 2 animals, we did not find any synonymous mutations and, thus, could not compute the hN/hS ratio.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 3. Correlation of MAFs for inheritable heteroplasmies between different tissues and correlation of the normalized variance with age. (A) MAF of heteroplasmies in heart vs. muscle. (B) MAF of heteroplasmies in liver vs. muscle. (C) MAF of heteroplasmies in heart vs. liver. (D) MAF of heteroplasmies in somatic tissues (averaged among liver, muscle, and heart) vs. oocytes (averaged among all oocytes studied per animal). (E and F) Correlations of MAFs in muscle and heart, separated into young (E) and intermediate 2 plus old (F) age groups. Additional correlations between somatic tissues are in SI Appendix, Fig. S15. (G and H) Correlations of mean MAFs in somatic tissues and mean MAFs of all oocytes analyzed per animal, separately for young (G) and intermediate 2 plus old (H) age groups. (I and J) Correlation of the normalized variance of heteroplasmy MAF for somatic tissues (I) or single oocytes (J) with age. The gray bands are confidence intervals around the regression line, and the dashed lines are the 1:1 relationship. Dot size for oocyte plots reflects the number of sampled oocytes for each animal and heteroplasmic site.
Fig. 3. Correlation of MAFs for inheritable heteroplasmies between different tissues and correlation of the normalized variance with age. (A) MAF of heteroplasmies in heart vs. muscle. (B) MAF of heteroplasmies in liver vs. muscle. (C) MAF of heteroplasmies in heart vs. liver. (D) MAF of heteroplasmies in somatic tissues (averaged among liver, muscle, and heart) vs. oocytes (averaged among all oocytes studied per animal). (E and F) Correlations of MAFs in muscle and heart, separated into young (E) and intermediate 2 plus old (F) age groups. Additional correlations between somatic tissues are in SI Appendix, Fig. S15. (G and H) Correlations of mean MAFs in somatic tissues and mean MAFs of all oocytes analyzed per animal, separately for young (G) and intermediate 2 plus old (H) age groups. (I and J) Correlation of the normalized variance of heteroplasmy MAF for somatic tissues (I) or single oocytes (J) with age. The gray bands are confidence intervals around the regression line, and the dashed lines are the 1:1 relationship. Dot size for oocyte plots reflects the number of sampled oocytes for each animal and heteroplasmic site.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. 10.1146/annurev.genom.6.080604.162249 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0070-2153(06)77004-1 · DOI
  3. 10.1073/pnas.1409328111 · DOI
  4. 10.1126/science.aau6520 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/ng.3469 · DOI
  6. 10.1101/gr.255174.119 · DOI
  7. 10.1073/pnas.1906331116 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.03.010 · DOI
  9. M. Ancora , Complete sequence of human mitochondrial DNA obtained by combining multiple displacement amplification and next-generation sequencing on a single oocyte. Mitochondrial DNA A. DNA Mapp. Seq. Anal. 28, 180–181 (2017).
  10. 10.1093/humrep/dex268 · DOI
  11. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000745 · DOI
  12. 10.1146/annurev-genom-091416-035426 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00323-2 · DOI
  14. 10.1126/science.1102541 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/ajp.1350090203 · DOI
  16. E. P. Walker, R. M. Nowak, J. L. Paradiso, Walker’s Mammals of the World (John Hopkins University Press, 1983).
  17. 10.1073/pnas.1208715109 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1186/s12859-020-3419-8 · DOI
  19. 10.1073/pnas.1419651112 · DOI
  20. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003990 · DOI
  21. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000209 · DOI
  22. 10.1098/rstb.2019.0175 · DOI
  23. 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0104 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/B978-0-12-381365-7.00008-X · DOI
  25. 10.1093/biolre/ioaa194 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/humupd/dmw028 · DOI
  27. 10.1101/gr.204255.116 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/s41467-019-12023-w · DOI
  29. 10.1073/pnas.1600374113 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/s41536-018-0044-5 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)62305-1 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2008.00426.x · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.026 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.04.028 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.12.012 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1093/nar/gky456 · DOI
  37. 10.1073/pnas.95.7.3578 · DOI
  38. 10.1042/EBC20170100 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80688-1 · DOI
  40. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000263 · DOI
  41. 10.3390/cells10092484 · DOI
  42. 10.3389/fgene.2017.00166 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1038/srep23421 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.04.100 · DOI
  45. 10.1093/nar/gkz762 · DOI
  46. 10.1073/pnas.1009687108 · DOI
  47. 10.1038/ng.2702 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.12.021 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)69373-7 · DOI
  50. 10.1073/pnas.0805399105 · DOI
  51. 10.1038/embor.2012.161 · DOI
  52. 10.1093/nar/gkaa1269 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003929 · DOI
  54. 10.1038/s42255-021-00378-8 · DOI
  55. 10.1534/genetics.118.300711 · DOI
  56. B. Arbeithuber Raw sequencing reads. Sequence Read Archive. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=PRJNA777828. Deposited 8 October 2021.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 40

Metadata

Authors
Arbeithuber, B., Cremona, M. A., Hester, J., Barrett, A., Higgins, B., Anthony, K., Chiaromonte, F., Diaz, F. J., & Makova, K. D.
Affiliations
  • Department of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
  • Department of Operations and Decision Systems, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V0A6, Canada
  • Department of Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
  • Center for Medical Genomics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2022-04-08
Volume
119
Issue
15
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
40
References
4
Language
en
Funders
HHS | National Institutes of Health (R01GM116044)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review