Cited by 141Mitochondrial Function and PathologyDNA Repair MechanismsCarcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment

Origins of human mitochondrial point mutations as DNA polymerase γ-mediated errors

Zheng, Weiming, Khrapko, Konstantin, Coller, Hilary A., Thilly, William G., Copeland, William C.·2006·Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis

Abstract

Mitochondrial mutational spectra in human cells, tissues and derived tumors for bp 10,030-10,130 are essentially identical, suggesting a predominant mutagenic role for endogenous processes. We hypothesized that errors mediated by mitochondrial DNA polymerase gamma were the primary sources of mutations. Point mutations created in this sequence by human DNA pol gamma in vitro were thus compared to the eighteen mutational hotspots, all single base substitutions, previously found in human tissues. The set of concordant hotspots accounted for 83% of these in vivo mutational events. About half of these mutations are insensitive to prolonged heating of DNA during PCR and half increase proportionally with heating time at 98 degrees C. Primary misincorporation errors and miscopying errors past thermal denaturing products such as deaminated cytosines (uracils) thus appear to be of approximately equal importance. For the sequence studied, these data support the conclusion that, endogenous error mediated by DNA pol gamma constitutes the primary source of mitochondrial point mutations in human tissues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.12.012

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zheng, W., Khrapko, K., Coller, H. A., Thilly, W. G., & Copeland, W. C.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Copeland, William C.
Venue
Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-07
Volume
599
Issue
1-2
Pages
11-20
ISSN
  • 0027-5107 (ISSN-L)
  • 1386-1964
OpenAlex
W2026609135
Cited by
141
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (5P30ES02109, P01-ES07168)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Keywords
mitochondrial DNA, point mutations, DNA polymerase gamma, mutational hotspots, mutational spectra, endogenous mutagenesis, human tissue
MeSH terms
DNA Polymerase gamma, Base Sequence, DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase, DNA, Mitochondrial, Humans, Lung, Mutagenesis, Point Mutation, Electrophoresis, Capillary, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review