The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Binding sites in Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase communicate by modulating the conformational ensemble
Open accessAbstract
To explore how distal mutations affect binding sites and how binding sites in proteins communicate, an ensemble-based model of the native state was used to define the energetic connectivities between the different structural elements of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase. Analysis of this model protein has allowed us to identify two important aspects of intramolecular communication. First, within a protein, pair-wise couplings exist that define the magnitude and extent to which mutational effects propagate from the point of origin. These pair-wise couplings can be identified from a quantity we define as the residue-specific connectivity. Second, in addition to the pair-wise energetic coupling between residues, there exists functional connectivity, which identifies energetic coupling between entire functional elements (i.e., binding sites) and the rest of the protein. Analysis of the energetic couplings provides access to the thermodynamic domain structure in dihydrofolate reductase as well as the susceptibility of the different regions of the protein to both small-scale (e.g., point mutations) and large-scale perturbations (e.g., binding ligand). The results point toward a view of allosterism and signal transduction wherein perturbations do not necessarily propagate through structure via a series of conformational distortions that extend from one active site to another. Instead, the observed behavior is a manifestation of the distribution of states in the ensemble and how the distribution is affected by the perturbation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The ensemble nature of allostery
Motlagh, H. N., Wrabl, J. O., Li, J., & Hilser, V. J. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13001 · Cited by 1,247
Self-citationStructure and dynamics of molecular networks: A novel paradigm of drug discovery
Csermely, P., Korcsmáros, T., Kiss, H. J. M., London, G., & Nussinov, R. (2013) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.01.016 · Cited by 892
Intrinsic disorder as a mechanism to optimize allosteric coupling in proteins
Hilser, V. J., & Thompson, E. B. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0700329104 · Cited by 406
Self-citationHidden dynamic allostery in a PDZ domain
Petit, C. M., Zhang, J., Sapienza, P. J., Fuentes, E. J., & Lee, A. L. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0904492106 · Cited by 344
Structural and Energetic Basis of Allostery
Hilser, V. J., Wrabl, J. O., & Motlagh, H. N. (2012) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-050511-102319 · Cited by 317
Self-citationIgumenova, T. I., Frederick, K. K., & Wand, A. J. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr040422h · Cited by 314
Protein flexibility and drug design: how to hit a moving target
Carlson, H. A. (2002) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/s1367-5931(02)00341-1 · Cited by 314
Bowman, G. R., & Geissler, P. L. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1209309109 · Cited by 279
Gene regulation by the glucocorticoid receptor: structure:function relationship
Kumar, R., & Thompson, E. B. (2005) · The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsbmb.2004.12.046 · Cited by 261
Boehr, D. D., McElheny, D., Dyson, H. J., & Wright, P. E. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0914163107 · Cited by 142
Grossman, M., Tworowski, D., Dym, O., Lee, M.-H., Levy, Y., Murphy, G., & Sagi, I. (2010) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi902141x · Cited by 68
Xia, Y., DiPrimio, N., Keppel, T. R., Vo, B., Fraser, K., Battaile, K. P., Egan, C., Bystroff, C., Lovell, S., Weis, D. D., et al. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja407644b · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Pan, H., Lee, J. C., & Hilser, V. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-10-17
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 12020-12025
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2031094493
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.