Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bacterial redox protein azurin, tumor suppressor protein p53, and regression of cancer

Open access
Yamada, Tohru, Goto, Masatoshi, Punj, Vasu, Zaborina, Olga, Chen, Mei Ling, Kimbara, Kazuhide, Majumdar, Dibyen, Cunningham, Elizabeth, Das Gupta, Tapas K., Chakrabarty, Ananda M.·2002·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The use of live bacteria in the treatment of cancer has a long and interesting history. We report the use of a purified bacterial redox protein, azurin, that enters human cancer (melanoma UISO-Mel-2) cells and induces apoptosis. The induction of apoptosis occurs readily in melanoma cells harboring a functional tumor suppressor protein p53, but much less efficiently in p53-null mutant melanoma (UISO-Mel-6) cells. A redox-negative mutant form of azurin (M44K/M64E) demonstrates much less cytotoxicity to the UISO-Mel-2 cells than the wild-type protein. Azurin has been shown to be internalized in UISO-Mel-2 cells and is localized predominantly in the cytosol and in the nuclear fraction. In the p53-null UISO-Mel-6 cells, azurin is localized only in the cytosol. Thus, intracellular trafficking of azurin to the nucleus is p53-dependent. Azurin forms a complex with p53, thereby stabilizing it and raising its intracellular level in cytosolic, mitochondrial, and nuclear fractions. Corresponding to an increasing level of p53, an inducer of apoptosis, the level of Bax also increases in mitochondria, allowing significant release of mitochondrial cytochrome c into the cytosol, thus initiating the onset of apoptosis. The M44K/M64E mutant form of azurin, deficient in cytotoxicity, is also deficient in forming a complex with p53 and is less efficient in stabilizing p53 than wild-type azurin. Azurin has been shown to allow regression of human UISO-Mel-2 tumors xenotransplanted in nude mice and may potentially be used in cancer treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.222539699

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 193

Metadata

Authors
Yamada, T., Goto, M., Punj, V., Zaborina, O., Chen, M. L., Kimbara, K., Majumdar, D., Cunningham, E., Das Gupta, T. K., & Chakrabarty, A. M.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2002-10-22
Volume
99
Issue
22
Pages
14098-14103
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1968888329
Cited by
193
References
8
FWCI
3.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial redox protein azurin, tumor suppressor protein p53, and regression of cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.222539699
The paper
Yamada, T., Goto, M., Punj, V., Zaborina, O., Chen, M. L., Kimbara, K., Majumdar, D., Cunningham, E., Das Gupta, T. K., & Chakrabarty, A. M. (2002). Bacterial redox protein azurin, tumor suppressor protein p53, and regression of cancer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.222539699

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.