Cited by 272Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationMarine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyGene Regulatory Network Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Developmental gene regulatory network architecture across 500 million years of echinoderm evolution

Open access
Hinman, Veronica F., Nguyen, Albert T., Cameron, R. Andrew, Davidson, Eric H.·2003·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Evolutionary change in morphological features must depend on architectural reorganization of developmental gene regulatory networks (GRNs), just as true conservation of morphological features must imply retention of ancestral developmental GRN features. Key elements of the provisional GRN for embryonic endomesoderm development in the sea urchin are here compared with those operating in embryos of a distantly related echinoderm, a starfish. These animals diverged from their common ancestor 520-480 million years ago. Their endomesodermal fate maps are similar, except that sea urchins generate a skeletogenic cell lineage that produces a prominent skeleton lacking entirely in starfish larvae. A relevant set of regulatory genes was isolated from the starfish Asterina miniata, their expression patterns determined, and effects on the other genes of perturbing the expression of each were demonstrated. A three-gene feedback loop that is a fundamental feature of the sea urchin GRN for endoderm specification is found in almost identical form in the starfish: a detailed element of GRN architecture has been retained since the Cambrian Period in both echinoderm lineages. The significance of this retention is highlighted by the observation of numerous specific differences in the GRN connections as well. A regulatory gene used to drive skeletogenesis in the sea urchin is used entirely differently in the starfish, where it responds to endomesodermal inputs that do not affect it in the sea urchin embryo. Evolutionary changes in the GRNs since divergence are limited sharply to certain cis-regulatory elements, whereas others have persisted unaltered.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2235868100

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bowring, S. D. & Erwin, D. H. (1998) GSA Today 8, 1-8.
  2. Sprinkle J. & Kier P. M. (1987) in Fossil Invertebrates eds. Boardman R. S. Cheetham A. H. & Rowell A. J. (Blackwell Scientific Cambridge MA) pp. 550-611.
  3. Fuchikami, T., Mitsunaga-Nakatsubo, K., Amemiya, S., Hosomi, T., Watanabe, T., Kurokawa, D., Kataoka, M., Harada, Y., Satoh, N., Kusunoki, S., et al. (2002) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 129, 5205-5216.
  4. Reuter, R. (1994) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 120, 1123-1135.
  5. Wray, G. A. & McClay, D. R. (1988) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 103, 305-315.
  6. Maruyama, Y. K. (2000) Zool. Sci. 17, 383-387.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 272

Metadata

Authors
Hinman, V. F., Nguyen, A. T., Cameron, R. A., & Davidson, E. H.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2003-10-31
Volume
100
Issue
23
Pages
13356-13361
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2165937624
Cited by
272
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 19
FWCI
5.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • KiltHub Repository
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (K07AG021587)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P40RR015044, RR15044)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
gene regulatory networks, echinoderm evolution, sea urchins, sea stars, endoderm specification, skeletogenesis, feedback loops, cis-regulatory elements, developmental gene expression, morphological evolution, embryonic development
MeSH terms
Animals, Cloning, Molecular, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Echinodermata, Biological Evolution, Mesoderm, Phylogeny, RNA, Messenger, Sea Urchins, Starfish, Time Factors, Transcription Factors, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Feedback, Physiological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review