Cited by 32Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationGene Regulatory Network AnalysisGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Evolution of gene regulatory network architectures: Examples of subcircuit conservation and plasticity between classes of echinoderms

Open access
Hinman, Veronica F., Yankura, Kristen A., McCauley, Brenna S.·2009·Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms

Abstract

Developmental gene regulatory networks (GRNs) explain how regulatory states are established in particular cells during development and how these states then determine the final form of the embryo. Evolutionary changes to the sequence of the genome will direct reorganization of GRN architectures, which in turn will lead to the alteration of developmental programs. A comparison of GRN architectures must consequently reveal the molecular basis for the evolution of developmental programs among different organisms. This review highlights some of the important findings that have emerged from the most extensive direct comparison of GRN architectures to date. Comparison of the orthologous GRNs for endomesodermal specification in the sea urchin and sea star, provides examples of several discrete, functional GRN subcircuits and shows that they are subject to diverse selective pressures. This demonstrates that different regulatory linkages may be more or less amenable to evolutionary change. One of the more surprising findings from this comparison is that GRN-level functions may be maintained while the factors performing the functions have changed, suggesting that GRNs have a high capacity for compensatory changes involving transcription factor binding to cis regulatory modules.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2009.01.004

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Certain remarkably conserved regulatory sub-circuits located near the top of developmental GRN hierarchy may serve to lock down developmental processes specific to given phyla or classes (GRN kernels).

    “Certain remarkably conserved regulatory sub-circuits that are located near the top of developmental GRN hierarchy may serve to lock down developmental process specific to given phyla or classes (GRN kernels)86–91.”

    From Emerging properties of animal gene regulatory networks (2010) · cites this paper as [91]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hinman, V. F., Yankura, K. A., & McCauley, B. S.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Corresponding author
Hinman, Veronica F.
Venue
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
1789
Issue
4
Pages
326-332
ISSN
1874-9399 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013395775
Cited by
32
References
12
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • KiltHub Repository
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
gene regulatory networks, Echinodermata, sea urchins, sea stars, cis-regulatory modules, transcription factor binding, compensatory evolution
MeSH terms
Animals, Echinodermata, Evolution, Molecular, Gene Regulatory Networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review