The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling current and future potential wintering distributions of eastern North American monarch butterflies
Open accessAbstract
Monarch butterflies overwinter in restricted areas in montane oyamel fir forests in central Mexico with specific microclimates that allow the butterflies to survive for up to 5 months. We use ecological niche modeling (ENM) to identify areas adequate for overwintering monarch colonies under both current and future climate scenarios. The ENM approach permits testing and validation of model predictivity, and yields quantitative, testable predictions regarding likely future climate change effects. Our models predicted monarch presence with a high degree of accuracy, and indicated that precipitation and diurnal temperature range were key environmental factors in making locations suitable for monarchs. When we projected monarch distribution onto future climate scenarios (Hadley Centre climate models), we found that conditions were likely to be inadequate across the entire current winter range, particularly owing to increased cool-weather precipitation that could cause increased mortality. This study applies ENM to understanding the seasonal dynamics of a migratory species under climate change, and uses ENM to identify key limiting environmental parameters in species' responses to climate change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change
Warren, M. S., Hill, J. K., Thomas, J. A., Asher, J., Fox, R., Huntley, B., Roy, D. B., Telfer, M. G., Jeffcoate, S., Harding, P., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35102054 · Cited by 1,333
Cited by
Physiological Diversity in Insects: Ecological and Evolutionary Contexts
Chown, S. L., & Terblanche, J. S. (2006) · Advances in Insect Physiology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2806(06)33002-0 · Cited by 573
A primer on insect cold-tolerance
Lee, R. E. (2010) · Low Temperature Biology of Insects · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511675997.002 · Cited by 324
Decline of monarch butterflies overwintering in Mexico: is the migratory phenomenon at risk?
BROWER, L. P., TAYLOR, O. R., WILLIAMS, E. H., SLAYBACK, D. A., ZUBIETA, R. R., & RAMÍREZ, M. I. (2012) · Insect Conservation and Diversity · doi:10.1111/j.1752-4598.2011.00142.x · Cited by 309
Chronobiology of interspecific interactions in a changing world
Kronfeld-Schor, N., Visser, M. E., Salis, L., & van Gils, J. A. (2017) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0248 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Oberhauser, K., & Peterson, A. T.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-11-11
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 14063-14068
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2093699162
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling current and future potential wintering distributions of eastern North American monarch butterflies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.2331584100
- The paper
- Oberhauser, K., & Peterson, A. T. (2003). Modeling current and future potential wintering distributions of eastern North American monarch butterflies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2331584100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.