The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mineralized matrix deposition by marrow stromal osteoblasts in 3D perfusion culture increases with increasing fluid shear forces
Open accessAbstract
In this study we report on direct involvement of fluid shear stresses on the osteoblastic differentiation of marrow stromal cells. Rat bone marrow stromal cells were seeded in 3D porous titanium fiber mesh scaffolds and cultured for 16 days in a flow perfusion bioreactor with perfusing culture media of different viscosities while maintaining the fluid flow rate constant. This methodology allowed exposure of the cultured cells to increasing levels of mechanical stimulation, in the form of fluid shear stress, whereas chemotransport conditions for nutrient delivery and waste removal remained essentially constant. Under similar chemotransport for the cultured cells in the 3D porous scaffolds, increasing fluid shear forces led to increased mineral deposition, suggesting that the mechanical stimulation provided by fluid shear forces in 3D flow perfusion culture can indeed enhance the expression of the osteoblastic phenotype. Increased fluid shear forces also resulted in the generation of a better spatially distributed extracellular matrix inside the porosity of the 3D titanium fiber mesh scaffolds. The combined effect of fluid shear forces on the mineralized extracellular matrix production and distribution emphasizes the importance of mechanosensation on osteoblastic cell function in a 3D environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Taking Cell-Matrix Adhesions to the Third Dimension
Cukierman, E., Pankov, R., Stevens, D. R., & Yamada, K. M. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1064829 · Cited by 3,027
Weinstein, R. S., Jilka, R. L., Parfitt, A. M., & Manolagas, S. C. (1998) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci2799 · Cited by 1,753
Review: Bone tissue engineering: The role of interstitial fluid flow
Hillsley, M. V., & Frangos, J. A. (1994) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.260430706 · Cited by 270
Cited by
Balancing forces: architectural control of mechanotransduction
DuFort, C. C., Paszek, M. J., & Weaver, V. M. (2011) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3112 · Cited by 985
Spiller, K. L., Nassiri, S., Witherel, C. E., Anfang, R. R., Ng, J., Nakazawa, K. R., Yu, T., & Vunjak-Novakovic, G. (2015) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.017 · Cited by 773
Osteoblast Differentiation at a Glance
Rutkovskiy, A., Stensløkken, K.-O., & Vaage, I. J. (2016) · Medical Science Monitor Basic Research · doi:10.12659/msmbr.901142 · Cited by 621
Engineered Microenvironments for Controlled Stem Cell Differentiation
Burdick, J. A., & Vunjak-Novakovic, G. (2009) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0131 · Cited by 485
Medical applications of membranes: Drug delivery, artificial organs and tissue engineering
Stamatialis, D. F., Papenburg, B. J., Gironés, M., Saiful, S., Bettahalli, S. N. M., Schmitmeier, S., & Wessling, M. (2008) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2007.09.059 · Cited by 473
Metadata
- Authors
- Sikavitsas, V. I., Bancroft, G. N., Holtorf, H. L., Jansen, J. A., & Mikos, A. G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 14683-14688
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2106346796
- Cited by
- 472
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mineralized matrix deposition by marrow stromal osteoblasts in 3D perfusion culture increases with increasing fluid shear forces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.2434367100
- The paper
- Sikavitsas, V. I., Bancroft, G. N., Holtorf, H. L., Jansen, J. A., & Mikos, A. G. (2003). Mineralized matrix deposition by marrow stromal osteoblasts in 3D perfusion culture increases with increasing fluid shear forces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2434367100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.