The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Top-down mass spectrometry of a 29-kDa protein for characterization of any posttranslational modification to within one residue
Open accessAbstract
A mass difference between the measured molecular weight of a protein and that of its DNA-predicted sequence indicates sequence errors and/or posttranslational modifications. In the top-down mass spectrometry approach, the measured molecular ion is dissociated, and these fragment masses are matched against those predicted from the protein sequence to restrict the locations of the errors/modifications. The proportion of the ion's interresidue bonds that are cleaved determines the specificity of such locations; previously, ubiquitin (76 residues) was the largest for which all such bonds were dissociated. Now, cleavages are achieved for carbonic anhydrase at 250 of the 258 interresidue locations. Cleavages of three spectra would define posttranslational modifications at 235 residues to within one residue. For 24 of the 34 possible phosphorylation sites, the cleavages of one spectrum would delineate exactly all −PO 3 H substitutions. This result has been achieved with electron-capture dissociation by minimizing the further cleavage of primary product ions and by denaturing the tertiary noncovalent bonding of the molecular ions under a variety of conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Peptide and protein sequence analysis by electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry
Syka, J. E. P., Coon, J. J., Schroeder, M. J., Shabanowitz, J., & Hunt, D. F. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0402700101 · Cited by 2,370
McDonnell, L. A., & Heeren, R. M. A. (2007) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.20124 · Cited by 1,082
Definitions of terms relating to mass spectrometry (IUPAC Recommendations 2013)
Murray, K. K., Boyd, R. K., Eberlin, M. N., Langley, G. J., Li, L., & Naito, Y. (2013) · Pure and Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1351/pac-rec-06-04-06 · Cited by 687
Interpreting the protein language using proteomics
Jensen, O. N. (2006) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1939 · Cited by 502
Proteomics by FTICR mass spectrometry: Top down and bottom up
Bogdanov, B., & Smith, R. D. (2005) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.20015 · Cited by 447
Metadata
- Authors
- Sze, S. K., Ge, Y., Oh, H., & McLafferty, F. W.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2002-02-12
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1774-1779
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2014578458
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Top-down mass spectrometry of a 29-kDa protein for characterization of any posttranslational modification to within one residue. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.251691898
- The paper
- Sze, S. K., Ge, Y., Oh, H., & McLafferty, F. W. (2002). Top-down mass spectrometry of a 29-kDa protein for characterization of any posttranslational modification to within one residue. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.251691898
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.