The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The early stages of duplicate gene evolution
Open accessAbstract
Gene duplications are one of the primary driving forces in the evolution of genomes and genetic systems. Gene duplicates account for 8–20% of the genes in eukaryotic genomes, and the rates of gene duplication are estimated at between 0.2% and 2% per gene per million years. Duplicate genes are believed to be a major mechanism for the establishment of new gene functions and the generation of evolutionary novelty, yet very little is known about the early stages of the evolution of duplicated gene pairs. It is unclear, for example, to what extent selection, rather than neutral genetic drift, drives the fixation and early evolution of duplicate loci. Analysis of recently duplicated genes in the Arabidopsis thaliana genome reveals significantly reduced species-wide levels of nucleotide polymorphisms in the progenitor and/or duplicate gene copies, suggesting that selective sweeps accompany the initial stages of the evolution of these duplicated gene pairs. Our results support recent theoretical work that indicates that fates of duplicate gene pairs may be determined in the initial phases of duplicate gene evolution and that positive selection plays a prominent role in the evolutionary dynamics of the very early histories of duplicate nuclear genes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana
Initiative, T. A. G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35048692 · Cited by 9,301
The Evolutionary Fate and Consequences of Duplicate Genes
Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5494.1151 · Cited by 4,988
An improved Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance
SIMES, R. J. (1986) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/73.3.751 · Cited by 2,396
Role of duplicate genes in genetic robustness against null mutations
Gu, Z., Steinmetz, L. M., Gu, X., Scharfe, C., Davis, R. W., & Li, W.-H. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01198 · Cited by 889
Cited by
Cannon, S. B., Mitra, A., Baumgarten, A., Young, N. D., & May, G. (2004) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2229-4-10 · Cited by 2,372
The evolution of gene duplications: classifying and distinguishing between models
Innan, H., & Kondrashov, F. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2689 · Cited by 1,307
He, X., & Zhang, J. (2005) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.104.037051 · Cited by 694
Nelson, D. R., Schuler, M. A., Paquette, S. M., Werck-Reichhart, D., & Bak, S. (2004) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.104.039826 · Cited by 477
Distinguishing Among Evolutionary Models for the Maintenance of Gene Duplicates
Hahn, M. W. (2009) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/esp047 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, R. C., & Purugganan, M. D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-12-11
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 15682-15687
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2105232382
- Cited by
- 647
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 23.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The early stages of duplicate gene evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.2535513100
- The paper
- Moore, R. C., & Purugganan, M. D. (2003). The early stages of duplicate gene evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2535513100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.