The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Genetic heterogeneity in familial hypercholesterolemia: evidence for two different mutations affecting functions of low-density lipoprotein receptor.
Open accessAbstract
Studies in cultured fibroblasts from patients with the clinical syndrome of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia have disclosed two different mutations affecting the functions of the low density lipoprotein receptor. One of these mutations, described previously, results in a functionless receptor that does not bind low density lipoproteins. In the cells of six patients who appear to be homozygous for this mutant allele, i.e., receptor-negative homozygotes, low density lipoproteins neither suppress hydroxymethylgultaryl-CoA reductase (NADPH) [mevalonate:NADP+ oxidoreductase (CoA-acylating) EC 1.1.1.34] activity nor stimulate cellular cholesterol esterification, even when examined in the presence of concentrations of lipoprotein 500 times higher than those cells. The second type of mutation, described herein, results in a receptor that has a reduced but not absent function. Fibroblasts from three subjects who possess this mutation, i.e., receptor-defective homozygotes, show partial suppression of the same enzyme activity and a detectable increase in cholesterol esterification capacity in the presence of high levels of low density lipoproteins. It was calculated that their degree of function could be achieved if they possessed only about 10% of the normal binding of low density lipoprotein. This level of binding was too low to be reliably detected by the 125-I-labeled low density lipoprotein binding assay. The finding of a second class of mutant cells in which a defect in low density lipoprotein binding is associated with simultaneous defects in both suppression of hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase activity and stimulation of cholesterol ester formation provides further evidence for the coordinate control of these two processes by the low density lipoprotein receptor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Basu, S. K., Goldstein, J. L., Anderson, G. W., & Brown, M. S. (1976) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.73.9.3178 · Cited by 1,021
Self-citationBrown, M. S., & Goldstein, J. L. (1976) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.174194 · Cited by 725
Self-citationReceptor-mediated endocytosis: insights from the lipoprotein receptor system
Brown, M. S., & Goldstein, J. L. (1979) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.76.7.3330 · Cited by 506
Self-citationAnderson, R. G. W., Brown, M. S., & Goldstein, J. L. (1977) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(77)90022-8 · Cited by 489
Self-citationInnerarity, T. L., & Mahley, R. W. (1978) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00601a013 · Cited by 433
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldstein, J. L., Dana, S. E., Brunschede, G. Y., & Brown, M. S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1975-03
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1092-1096
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2005821105
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 39.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic heterogeneity in familial hypercholesterolemia: evidence for two different mutations affecting functions of low-density lipoprotein receptor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.72.3.1092
- The paper
- Goldstein, J. L., Dana, S. E., Brunschede, G. Y., & Brown, M. S. (1975). Genetic heterogeneity in familial hypercholesterolemia: evidence for two different mutations affecting functions of low-density lipoprotein receptor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.72.3.1092
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.