The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phase variation in Salmonella: genetic analysis of a recombinational switch.
Open accessAbstract
The alternative expression of Salmonella genes H1 and H2, which specify different flagellar antigens, results in the oscillation of phenotype known as phase variation. This alternation is controlled by the inversion of an 800-base-pair sequence of DNA adjacent to, or including part of, the H2 gene. The invertable region was presumed to regulate the function of a promoter and to include specific sites at which a recombinational event, resulting in the inversion, could occur. Here we report genetic manipulations of hybrid lambda phage carrying the H2 gene that were used to define the H2 promoter region and the recombinational sites. The H2 gene fragment was inserted on a hybrid lambda phage next to the cheW gene, which lacked a promoter element. In the resulting fusion, cheW gene activity was restored, the expression of the H2 and cheW genes was controlled coordinately by the inversion, and the polarity of transcription and location of the H2 gene could be determined. Evidence from this type of gene fusion suggested that the H2 gene promoter is included in the inversion region. Hybrid H2 phage were constructed that contained substitutions for regions of the H2 gene. In contrast to hybrid lambda containing the H2 gene, which alternate between "on" and "off" states, several substituted lambdaH2 were fixed in the "on" state. A site necessary for the recombinational event must have been removed in these fixed lambdaH2.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bacterial contingency loci: the role of simple sequence DNA repeats in bacterial adaptation
Moxon, R., Bayliss, C., & Hood, D. (2006) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090442 · Cited by 438
Immunology and Evolution of Infectious Disease
Frank, S. A. (2002) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691220161 · Cited by 393
Microbiology in the post-genomic era
Medini, D., Serruto, D., Parkhill, J., Relman, D. A., Donati, C., Moxon, R., Falkow, S., & Rappuoli, R. (2008) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1901 · Cited by 358
Ryall, B., Eydallin, G., & Ferenci, T. (2012) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.05028-11 · Cited by 160
Flipping DNA to generate and regulate microbial consortia
Ramadas, R., & Thattai, M. (2010) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.109.105999 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Silverman, M., Zieg, J., Hilmen, M., & Simon, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1979-01
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 391-395
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1970793246
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase variation in Salmonella: genetic analysis of a recombinational switch. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.76.1.391
- The paper
- Silverman, M., Zieg, J., Hilmen, M., & Simon, M. (1979). Phase variation in Salmonella: genetic analysis of a recombinational switch. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.76.1.391
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.