Cited by 7Evolution and Genetic DynamicsGene Regulatory Network AnalysisMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

Flipping DNA to generate and regulate microbial consortia

Open access
Ramadas, Rohini, Thattai, Mukund·2010·Genetics

Abstract

Communities of interdependent microbes, found in diverse natural contexts, have recently attracted the attention of bioengineers. Such consortia have potential applications in biosynthesis, with metabolic tasks distributed over several phenotypes, and in live-cell microbicide therapies where phenotypic diversity might aid in immune evasion. Here we investigate one route to generate synthetic microbial consortia and to regulate their phenotypic diversity, through programmed genetic interconversions. In our theoretical model, genotypes involve ordered combinations of DNA elements representing promoters, protein-coding genes, and transcription terminators; genotypic interconversions are driven by a recombinase enzyme that inverts DNA segments; and selectable phenotypes correspond to distinct patterns of gene expression. We analyze the microbial population as it evolves along a graph whose nodes are distinct genotypes and whose edges are interconversions. We show that the steady-state proportion of each genotype depends on its own growth advantage, as well as on its connectivity to other genotypes. Multiple phenotypes with identical or distinct growth rates can be indefinitely maintained in the population, while their proportion can be regulated by varying the rate of DNA flipping. Recombinase-based synthetic constructs have already been implemented; the graph-theoretic framework developed here will be useful in adapting them to generate microbial consortia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1534/genetics.109.105999

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cultivating microbes in bioreactors may generate spontaneous mutations, and gene flipping may change their function.

    “Moreover, cultivation of microbes in bioreactors may generate spontaneous mutations, and gene flipping may potentially change their function.163”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramadas, R., & Thattai, M.
Affiliations
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (IN)
Corresponding author
Thattai, Mukund
Venue
Genetics
Published
2010-01-01
Volume
184
Issue
1
Pages
285-293
ISSN
  • 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-2631
OpenAlex
W2130462742
Cited by
7
References
46
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
synthetic microbial consortia, recombinases, phenotypic diversity, genotype-phenotype mapping, population evolution, gene expression regulation, microbial communities, biosynthesis
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Bacterial Proteins, DNA, Bacterial, Genetic Engineering, Genotype, Models, Genetic, Phenotype, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Recombinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review