The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sensory neurons in culture: Changing requirements for survival factors during embryonic development
Open accessAbstract
The effect of nerve growth factor (NGF) and medium conditioned by glioma cells (GCM) on the survival of chicken sensory neurons in culture was investigated. Neurons were isolated from embryos 8 days (E8) to 16 days (E16) old and the proportion of surviving neurons was determined after 2 days in culture. In the absence of NGF or GCM, essentially no neurons survived at any age. In the presence of NGF, survival increased from 25% of the neurons at E8 to 40% between E10 and E12 and then decreased to background level (5%) at E16. In contrast, in the presence of GCM, survival increased continuously from 10% of the neurons at E8 to 75% at E16. At early developmental stages, the effect of NGF and GCM together was greater than the sum of their individual effects: at E8, about 80% of the neurons survived, double the number expected for a simple additive effect. Thus, a significant proportion of chicken neurons from dorsal root ganglia require both NGF and GCM for survival, and this may well include neurons from the ventro-lateral population, which do not respond to NGF alone. As neurons matured, the double requirement progressively decreased and, by E16, NGF no longer increased the number of neurons over that surviving in response to GCM alone. The facts that rat brain extracts mimicked the effect of GCM and that the potency of the brain extracts of rat in the postnatal period increased in parallel with the development of the glial cells suggest that glial cells produce a factor(s) both immunologically and functionally different from NGF which supports the survival of sensory neurons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Purification of a new neurotrophic factor from mammalian brain.
Barde, Y. A., Edgar, D., & Thoenen, H. (1982) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01207.x · Cited by 1,822
Self-citationRequirement for BDNF in activity-dependent survival of cortical neurons
Ghosh, A., Carnahan, J., & Greenberg, M. E. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7907431 · Cited by 989
A low voltage-activated, fully inactivating Ca channel in vertebrate sensory neurones
Carbone, E., & Lux, H. D. (1984) · Nature · doi:10.1038/310501a0 · Cited by 870
Edgar, D., Timpl, R., & Thoenen, H. (1984) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb01997.x · Cited by 630
Self-citationSohrabji, F., Miranda, R., & Toran-Allerand, C. (1994) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.14-02-00459.1994 · Cited by 360
Metadata
- Authors
- Barde, Y.-A., Edgar, D., & Thoenen, H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1980-02
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1199-1203
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1990870432
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensory neurons in culture: Changing requirements for survival factors during embryonic development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.77.2.1199
- The paper
- Barde, Y.-A., Edgar, D., & Thoenen, H. (1980). Sensory neurons in culture: Changing requirements for survival factors during embryonic development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.77.2.1199
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.