Cited by 204Carcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentInflammatory mediators and NSAID effectsRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processes

Skin tumor promotion by phorbol esters is a two-stage process.

Open access
Fürstenberger, G, Berry, D L, Sorg, B, Marks, F·1981·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

In the semisynthetic compound phorbol 12-retinoate 13-acetate (PRA), the antipromoting principle of vitamin A acid is combined with the structure of a phorbol ester tumor promoter. In skin of NMRI mice, a single topical application of PRA induces skin inflammation, epidermal proliferation, and sustained hyperplasia to a similar extent and apparently along the same pathway as an equimolar dose of the strong tumor promoter phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA). The mitogenic effects of both PRA and PMA are mediated by prostaglandin E synthesis. However, in mouse skin initiated with 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene, PRA does not promote tumor development, even at a high dose. Under continuous PRA treatment, however, one to four applications of PMA (insufficient by itself to promote tumor growth) gave a strong tumor response. Thus, it can be demonstrated that the effects necessary for tumor promotion can be brought about by a single application of PMA and that the subsequent chronic hyperproliferation of epidermis is probably necessary only to make the tumors visible. By using the nonpromoting irritant mitogen PRA, the concept of two-stage tumor promotion can thus be strongly supported. Furthermore, in the NMRI mouse, PRA is a much more potent second-stage promoter than mezerein, recently reported to be an incomplete promoter in the Sencar mouse.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.78.12.7722

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TPA and EGF are potent promotors for carcinogenesis.

    “12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) and epidermal growth factor (EGF) are well known potent promotors for carcinogenesis [1,2].”

    From Control Mechanisms of the Tumor Suppressor PDCD4: Expression and Functions (2019) · cites this paper as [1]

    The paper describes phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA, also called TPA) as one of the most potent skin tumor promoters in mice (opening passage, page not provided). It does not address whether epidermal growth factor is a potent promoter, so it supports only the TPA part of the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Slaga, T. J., Sivak, A.' & Boutwell, R. K., eds. (1978) Carcino- genesis, Mechanisms of Tumor Promotion and Cocarcinogenesis (Raven, New York), Vol. 2.
  2. Hecker, E., Fusenig, N. E., Marks, F., -Kunz, W. & Thielmann, H. W. (Raven, New York), Vol. 7, pp. 331-346.
  3. Slaga, T. J., Fischer, S. M., Nelson, K. & Gleason, G. L. (1980) Proc. NatL Acad. Sci. USA 77, 3659-3663.
  4. Busch, H. (Academic, New York), Vol. 6, pp. 439-484.
  5. Slaga, T. J., Klein-Szanto, A. J. P., Fischer, S. M., Weeks, G. E., Nelson, K. & Major, S. (1980) Proc. Nati Acad. Sci. USA 77, 2251-2254.
  6. Slaga, T. J., Sivak, A. & Boutwell, R. K. (Raven, New York), Vol. 2, pp. 97-116. Proc. Nad Acad. Sci. USA 78 (1981)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fürstenberger, G., Berry, D. L., Sorg, B., & Marks, F.
Affiliations
German Cancer Research Center (DE)
ORCID
Sorg, B
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1981-12
Volume
78
Issue
12
Pages
7722-7726
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2046907898
Cited by
204
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
Keywords
two-stage carcinogenesis, skin tumor promotion, phorbol ester, phorbol myristate acetate, vitamin A acid, epidermal hyperplasia, epidermal proliferation, skin inflammation, 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene, mezerein, NMRI mice
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Division, Diterpenes, Female, Mitogens, Neoplasms, Experimental, Phorbol Esters, Phorbols, Prostaglandins, Skin Neoplasms, Structure-Activity Relationship, Terpenes, 9,10-Dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review