The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cell size as a determinant of the clone-forming ability of human keratinocytes.
Open accessAbstract
Keratinocytes isolated from human epidermis and subsequently cultured may form clones if they are 11 micron or less in diameter but are irreversibly committed to further enlargement and terminal differentiation if they are 12 micron or more in diameter. When a founding cell of 11 micron or less forms a small rapidly growing clone in culture, the cells of that clone are able to found new colonies even when their diameter is as great as 20 micron. As the clone becomes larger and grows more slowly, the maximal size of its clonogenic cells is reduced toward that of the epidermis. A cultured cell of up to 20 micron in diameter can, when it divides, give rise to clonogenic progeny smaller than itself, thus reversing the process of enlargement. Cells larger than 20 micron cannot divide and therefore cannot be rescued from terminal differentiation. It is concluded that when keratinocytes multiply rapidly, they extend reversibly the maximal size at which they are capable of generating clones into the range usually characteristic of terminally differentiating cells. It is proposed that this mechanism enables the keratinocyte to accommodate an increased rate of multiplication to its need to attain a large size during terminal differentiation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Three clonal types of keratinocyte with different capacities for multiplication.
Barrandon, Y., & Green, H. (1987) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.84.8.2302 · Cited by 1,294
Self-citationEpidermal homeostasis: a balancing act of stem cells in the skin
Blanpain, C., & Fuchs, E. (2009) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2636 · Cited by 1,270
Dickson, M. A., Hahn, W. C., Ino, Y., Ronfard, V., Wu, J. Y., Weinberg, R. A., Louis, D. N., Li, F. P., & Rheinwald, J. G. (2000) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.20.4.1436-1447.2000 · Cited by 1,104
p63 Is Essential for the Proliferative Potential of Stem Cells in Stratified Epithelia
Senoo, M., Pinto, F., Crum, C. P., & McKeon, F. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.045 · Cited by 881
Pellegrini, G., Golisano, O., Paterna, P., Lambiase, A., Bonini, S., Rama, P., & De Luca, M. (1999) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.145.4.769 · Cited by 722
Metadata
- Authors
- Barrandon, Y., & Green, H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1985-08
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 5390-5394
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2037749974
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cell size as a determinant of the clone-forming ability of human keratinocytes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.82.16.5390
- The paper
- Barrandon, Y., & Green, H. (1985). Cell size as a determinant of the clone-forming ability of human keratinocytes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.82.16.5390
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.