The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Misread protein creates membrane channels: an essential step in the bactericidal action of aminoglycosides.
Open accessAbstract
Among the pleiotropic effects of aminoglycosides, their irreversible uptake and their blockade of initiating ribosomes have appeared to explain their bactericidal action, while the contributions of translational misreading and membrane damage and the mechanism of that damage have remained uncertain. We now present evidence that incorporation of misread proteins into the membrane can account for the membrane damage. The bactericidal action thus appears to result from the following sequence, in which each step is essential: slight initial entry of the antibiotic; interaction with chain-elongating ribosomes, resulting in misreading; incorporation of misread protein into the membrane, creating abnormal channels; increased (and irreversible) entry through these channels, and hence increased misreading and formation of channels; and, finally, blockade of initiating ribosomes. This mechanism can account for several previously unexplained observations: that streptomycin uptake requires protein synthesis during, but not after, the lag before the membrane damage; that streptomycin-resistant cells, which fail to take up streptomycin, can do so after treatment by another aminoglycoside; and that puromycin at moderate concentrations accelerates streptomycin uptake, while high concentrations (which release shorter chains) prevent it. In addition, puromycin, prematurely releasing polypeptides of normal sequence, also evidently creates channels, since it is reported to promote streptomycin uptake even in streptomycin-resistant cells. These findings imply that normal membrane proteins must be selected not only for a hydrophobic anchoring surface, but also for a tight fit in the membrane.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Persister cells, dormancy and infectious disease
Lewis, K. (2007) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1557 · Cited by 2,052
Lewis, K. (2010) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134306 · Cited by 1,858
Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance revisited
Darby, E. M., Trampari, E., Siasat, P., Gaya, M. S., Alav, I., Webber, M. A., & Blair, J. M. A. (2023) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-022-00820-y · Cited by 1,398
Antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus aureus: genetic basis
Lyon, B. R., & Skurray, R. A. (1987) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.51.1.88-134.1987 · Cited by 686
Mulcahy, L. R., Burns, J. L., Lory, S., & Lewis, K. (2010) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.01651-09 · Cited by 631
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, B. D., Chen, L. L., & Tai, P. C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1986-08
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 6164-6168
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2019585324
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Misread protein creates membrane channels: an essential step in the bactericidal action of aminoglycosides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.83.16.6164
- The paper
- Davis, B. D., Chen, L. L., & Tai, P. C. (1986). Misread protein creates membrane channels: an essential step in the bactericidal action of aminoglycosides. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.83.16.6164
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.