The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Myocardial ischemia and reperfusion: direct evidence for free radical generation by electron spin resonance spectroscopy.
Open accessAbstract
Electron spin resonance spectroscopy has recently been used by others to detect directly radical species in isolated perfused hearts. Sample processing prior to spectroscopy in this study involved pulverization of tissue, which can artifactually generate radical species. We assessed in isolated perfused hearts the influence of tissue pulverization on the identity of radical species detected by spectroscopy and then, using a processing technique less likely to induce artifacts, whether myocardial ischemia and reperfusion generate radical species. Rat and rabbit hearts (n = 8) were perfused aerobically for 10 min and freeze-clamped to -196 degrees C. Frozen tissue was processed at -196 degrees C for spectroscopic analysis by pulverization vs. chopping. Spectra of pulverized tissue consisted of three components: a semiquinone (g = 2.004), a lipid peroxy radical (g [ = 2.04 and g = 2.006), and a carbon-centered radical that is possibly a lipid radical (giso = 2.002 and AHzz approximately equal to 50 G). Chopped tissue consisted of a single component, a semiquinone (g = 2.004). Rat hearts (n = 8 per group) also underwent 10-min global no-flow normothermic ischemia followed by 5-60 sec of either aerobic or anaerobic reperfusion, with frozen tissue chopped prior to spectroscopy. Spectra of ischemic tissue consisted of an iron-sulfur center and a semiquinone. Aerobic reperfusion resulted in a spectrum similar to the control but with increased amplitude that peaked after 10-15 sec of reflow. Anaerobic reperfusion yielded a spectrum identical to that of ischemic tissue. We conclude that pulverization of frozen myocardial tissue arti-factually generates radical species. Using a nonpulverization technique for tissue processing, we found that myocardial ischemia and reperfusion produce radical species but that molecular oxygen is necessary for the burst of radical production during reflow.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oxygen-Derived Free Radicals in Postischemic Tissue Injury
Epstein, F. H., & McCord, J. M. (1985) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198501173120305 · Cited by 5,399
Cadenas, E., Boveris, A., Ragan, C. I., & Stoppani, A. O. M. (1977) · Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1016/0003-9861(77)90035-2 · Cited by 855
Cited by
Mechanism of myocardial "stunning".
Bolli, R. (1990) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.82.3.723 · Cited by 992
Stowe, D. F., & Camara, A. K. S. (2009) · Antioxidants & Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2008.2331 · Cited by 471
Oxygen-derived free radicals and myocardial reperfusion injury: An overview
Bolli, R. (1991) · Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy · doi:10.1007/bf00054747 · Cited by 295
Tsuchiya, K., Takiguchi, Y., Okamoto, M., Izawa, Y., Kanematsu, Y., Yoshizumi, M., & Tamaki, T. (2004) · Journal of Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1254/jphs.fmj04006x3 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Baker, J. E., Felix, C. C., Olinger, G. N., & Kalyanaraman, B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1988-04
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2786-2789
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2069915206
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Myocardial ischemia and reperfusion: direct evidence for free radical generation by electron spin resonance spectroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.85.8.2786
- The paper
- Baker, J. E., Felix, C. C., Olinger, G. N., & Kalyanaraman, B. (1988). Myocardial ischemia and reperfusion: direct evidence for free radical generation by electron spin resonance spectroscopy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.85.8.2786
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.