The DOI matches its Crossref record.
New World tetraploid cottons contain Old World cytoplasm
Open accessAbstract
New World tetraploid cottons ( Gossypium spp.) originated through hybridization of ancestral diploid species that presently have allopatric ranges in Asia-Africa (the A genome) and the New World tropics and subtropics (the D genome). Despite intensive study, the identity of the parental diploids and the antiquity of polyploidization remain unresolved. In this study, variation in the maternally inherited chloroplast genome was assessed among species representing both of the parental genomes and the tetraploids. Approximately 560 restriction sites were assayed in each accession, representing sequence information for about 3200 nucleotides. The resulting maternal phylogeny has no convergent restriction site mutations and demonstrates that the cytoplasm donor for all tetraploid species was an A genome diploid with a chloroplast genome that is similar to Gossypium arboreum and Gossypium herbaceum . No mutational differences were detected between these two species, and few mutations distinguish the chloroplast genomes of A genome diploids from those of tetraploid taxa. In contrast to expectations based on extensive taxonomic, geographic, and genetic diversity, a surprisingly low level of sequence divergence has accumulated subsequent to polyploidization. Chloroplast genomes of tetraploid species are distinguished from each other by between one and six apparent point mutations. The data suggest that tetraploid cotton originated relatively recently, perhaps within the last 1-2 million years, with subsequent rapid evolution and diversification throughout the New World tropics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Genome evolution in polyploids
Wendel, J. F. (2000) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1023/a:1006392424384 · Cited by 1,600
Self-citationLi, F., Fan, G., Lu, C., Xiao, G., Zou, C., Kohel, R. J., Ma, Z., Shang, H., Ma, X., Wu, J., et al. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3208 · Cited by 1,111
Wendel, J. F., Schnabel, A., & Seelanan, T. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.1.280 · Cited by 828
Self-citationPhylogenetic Incongruence: Window into Genome History and Molecular Evolution
Wendel, J. F., & Doyle, J. J. (1998) · Molecular Systematics of Plants II · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5419-6_10 · Cited by 649
Self-citationChloroplast DNA systematics: a review of methods and data analysis
Olmstead, R. G., & Palmer, J. D. (1994) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.1002/j.1537-2197.1994.tb15615.x · Cited by 648
Metadata
- Authors
- Wendel, J. F.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1989-06
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4132-4136
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2073512111
- Cited by
- 539
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New World tetraploid cottons contain Old World cytoplasm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.86.11.4132
- The paper
- Wendel, J. F. (1989). New World tetraploid cottons contain Old World cytoplasm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.86.11.4132
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.