The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Molecular cloning of a putative tetrodotoxin-resistant rat heart Na+ channel isoform.
Open accessAbstract
Voltage-gated Na+ channels in mammalian heart differ from those in nerve and skeletal muscle. One major difference is that tetrodotoxin (TTX)-resistant cardiac Na+ channels are blocked by 1-10 microM TTX, whereas TTX-sensitive nerve Na+ channels are blocked by nanomolar TTX concentrations. We constructed a cDNA library from 6-day-old rat hearts, where only low-affinity [3H]saxitoxin receptors, corresponding to TTX-resistant Na+ channels, were detected. We isolated several overlapping cDNA clones encompassing 7542 nucleotides and encoding the entire alpha subunit of a cardiac-specific Na+ channel isoform (designated rat heart I) as well as several rat brain I Na+ channel cDNA clones. The derived amino acid sequence of rat heart I was highly homologous to, but distinct from, previous Na+ channel clones. RNase protection studies showed that the corresponding mRNA species is abundant in newborn and adult rat hearts, but not detectable in brain or innervated skeletal muscle. The same mRNA species appears upon denervation of skeletal muscle, likely accounting for expression of new TTX-resistant Na+ channels. Thus, this cardiac-specific Na+ channel clone appears to encode a distinct TTX-resistant isoform and is another member of the mammalian Na+ channel multigene family, found in newborn heart and denervated skeletal muscles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Calcium channel characteristics conferred on the sodium channel by single mutations
Heinemann, S. H., Terlau, H., Stühmer, W., Imoto, K., & Numa, S. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/356441a0 · Cited by 784
Resurgence of sodium channel research
Goldin, A. L. (2001) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.63.1.871 · Cited by 688
Roy, M., & Narahashi, T. (1992) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.12-06-02104.1992 · Cited by 533
The roles of sodium channels in nociception: Implications for mechanisms of pain
Cummins, T. R., Sheets, P. L., & Waxman, S. G. (2007) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2007.07.026 · Cited by 485
Inherited disorders of voltage-gated sodium channels
George, A. L. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci25505 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Rogart, R. B., Cribbs, L. L., Muglia, L. K., Kephart, D. D., & Kaiser, M. W.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1989-10
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 8170-8174
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2114457659
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular cloning of a putative tetrodotoxin-resistant rat heart Na+ channel isoform. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.86.20.8170
- The paper
- Rogart, R. B., Cribbs, L. L., Muglia, L. K., Kephart, D. D., & Kaiser, M. W. (1989). Molecular cloning of a putative tetrodotoxin-resistant rat heart Na+ channel isoform. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.86.20.8170
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.