The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The distinct surface of human blood dendritic cells, as observed after an improved isolation method.
Open accessAbstract
Prior studies have identified a subset of dendritic cells in human blood, as well as their stimulatory function for T-cell-mediated immune responses. However research has been limited by difficulties in isolation, since dendritic cells make up only 0.1-1% of blood mononuclear cells. We present a protocol that reliably yields preparations that are greater than 80-90% pure. The method relies on the sequential depletion of the major cell types in blood and simultaneously provides T cells, monocytes, and B plus natural killer cells for comparison with dendritic cells. The last step in the procedure is the removal of residual contaminants on the basis of expression of a CD45R epitope. The enrichment of dendritic cells is evident by three criteria, each of which is related to the surface of these antigen-presenting cells. (i) All dendritic cells are motile, constantly forming large lamellipodia or veils. (ii) When analyzed with a large panel of monoclonal antibodies and the FACS, the cells express high levels of all known polymorphic major histocompatibility complex gene products, as well as a distinct combination of receptors and adhesion molecules. Unlike monocytes, for example, dendritic cells lack Fc receptors and the colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (c-fms) but express much higher levels of ICAM-1 and LFA-3 adhesins. (iii) In functional assays, dendritic cells are at least 100 times more potent than monocytes or lymphocytes in stimulating the primary mixed leukocyte reaction. These properties help make the trace subset of dendritic cells more amenable to further functional and clinical studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sallusto, F., & Lanzavecchia, A. (1994) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.179.4.1109 · Cited by 5,129
Vaccination of patients with B–cell lymphoma using autologous antigen–pulsed dendritic cells
Hsu, F. J., Benike, C., Fagnoni, F., Liles, T. M., Czerwinski, D., Taidi, B., Engleman, E. G., & Levy, R. (1996) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm0196-52 · Cited by 1,804
Sauter, B., Albert, M. L., Francisco, L., Larsson, M., Somersan, S., & Bhardwaj, N. (2000) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.191.3.423 · Cited by 1,358
Activation of human dendritic cells through CD40 cross-linking.
Caux, C., Massacrier, C., Vanbervliet, B., Dubois, B., Van Kooten, C., Durand, I., & Banchereau, J. (1994) · The Journal of experimental medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.180.4.1263 · Cited by 1,317
CD14+ blood monocytes can differentiate into functionally mature CD83+ dendritic cells.
Zhou, L. J., & Tedder, T. F. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.6.2588 · Cited by 1,067
Metadata
- Authors
- Freudenthal, P. S., & Steinman, R. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1990-10
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 7698-7702
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2127803059
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The distinct surface of human blood dendritic cells, as observed after an improved isolation method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.87.19.7698
- The paper
- Freudenthal, P. S., & Steinman, R. M. (1990). The distinct surface of human blood dendritic cells, as observed after an improved isolation method. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.19.7698
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.