The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consequences of Cell Death
Open accessAbstract
Cell death by necrosis is typically associated with inflammation, in contrast to apoptosis. We have identified additional distinctions between the two types of death that occur at the level of dendritic cells (DCs) and which influence the induction of immunity. DCs must undergo changes termed maturation to act as potent antigen-presenting cells. Here, we investigated whether exposure to apoptotic or necrotic cells affected DC maturation. We found that immature DCs efficiently phagocytose a variety of apoptotic and necrotic tumor cells. However, only exposure to the latter induces maturation. The mature DCs express high levels of the DC-restricted markers CD83 and lysosome-associated membrane glycoprotein (DC-LAMP) and the costimulatory molecules CD40 and CD86. Furthermore, they develop into powerful stimulators of both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Cross-presentation of antigens to CD8+ T cells occurs after uptake of apoptotic cells. We demonstrate here that optimal cross-presentation of antigens from tumor cells requires two steps: phagocytosis of apoptotic cells by immature DCs, which provides antigenic peptides for major histocompatibility complex class I and class II presentation, and a maturation signal that is delivered by exposure to necrotic tumor cells, their supernatants, or standard maturation stimuli, e.g., monocyte-conditioned medium. Thus, DCs are able to distinguish two types of tumor cell death, with necrosis providing a control that is critical for the initiation of immunity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fadok, V. A., Bratton, D. L., Konowal, A., Freed, P. W., Westcott, J. Y., & Henson, P. M. (1998) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci1112 · Cited by 3,166
Cited by
Martinon, F., Burns, K., & Tschopp, J. (2002) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00599-3 · Cited by 6,066
Antigen Presentation and T Cell Stimulation by Dendritic Cells
Guermonprez, P., Valladeau, J., Zitvogel, L., Théry, C., & Amigorena, S. (2002) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.100301.064828 · Cited by 1,926
Tumor-derived exosomes are a source of shared tumor rejection antigens for CTL cross-priming
Wolfers, J., Lozier, A., Raposo, G., Regnault, A., Théry, C., Masurier, C., Flament, C., Pouzieux, S., Faure, F., Tursz, T., et al. (2001) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/85438 · Cited by 1,640
Necroptosis: The Release of Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns and Its Physiological Relevance
Kaczmarek, A., Vandenabeele, P., & Krysko, D. V. (2013) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2013.02.003 · Cited by 1,411
The Cytosolic DNA-Sensing cGAS–STING Pathway in Cancer
Kwon, J., & Bakhoum, S. F. (2020) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-19-0761 · Cited by 1,293
Metadata
- Authors
- Sauter, B., Albert, M. L., Francisco, L., Larsson, M., Somersan, S., & Bhardwaj, N.
- Venue
- The Journal of Experimental Medicine
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 2000-02-07
- Volume
- 191
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 423-434
- ISSN
- 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9538
- OpenAlex
- W2166584906
- Cited by
- 1,358
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 48.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consequences of Cell Death. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.191.3.423
- The paper
- Sauter, B., Albert, M. L., Francisco, L., Larsson, M., Somersan, S., & Bhardwaj, N. (2000). Consequences of Cell Death. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.191.3.423
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.