The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Genetic organization of the cellulose synthase operon in Acetobacter xylinum.
Open accessAbstract
An operon encoding four proteins required for bacterial cellulose biosynthesis (bcs) in Acetobacter xylinum was isolated via genetic complementation with strains lacking cellulose synthase activity. Nucleotide sequence analysis indicated that the cellulose synthase operon is 9217 base pairs long and consists of four genes. The four genes--bcsA, bcsB, bcsC, and bcsD--appear to be translationally coupled and transcribed as a polycistronic mRNA with an initiation site 97 bases upstream of the coding region of the first gene (bcsA) in the operon. Results from genetic complementation tests and gene disruption analyses demonstrate that all four genes in the operon are required for maximal bacterial cellulose synthesis in A. xylinum. The calculated molecular masses of the proteins encoded by bcsA, bcsB, bcsC, and bcsD are 84.4, 85.3, 141.0, and 17.3 kDa, respectively. The second gene in the operon (bcsB) encodes the catalytic subunit of cellulose synthase. The functions of the bcsA, bcsC, and bcsD gene products are unknown. Bacterial strains mutated in the bcsA locus were found to be deficient in cellulose synthesis due to the lack of cellulose synthase and diguanylate cyclase activities. Mutants in the bcsC and bcsD genes were impaired in cellulose production in vivo, even though they had the capacity to make all the necessary metabolic precursors and cyclic diguanylic acid, the activator of cellulose synthase, and exhibit cellulose synthase activity in vitro. When the entire operon was present on a multicopy plasmid in the bacterial cell, both cellulose synthase activity and cellulose biosynthesis increased. When the promoter of the cellulose synthase operon was replaced on the chromosome by E. coli tac or lac promoters, cellulose production was reduced in parallel with decreased cellulose synthase activity. These observations suggest that the expression of the bcs operon is rate-limiting for cellulose synthesis in A. xylinum.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bacterial polymers: biosynthesis, modifications and applications
Rehm, B. H. A. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2354 · Cited by 899
Bacterial cellulose biosynthesis: diversity of operons, subunits, products, and functions
Römling, U., & Galperin, M. Y. (2015) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2015.05.005 · Cited by 573
Cellulose biosynthesis and function in bacteria
Ross, P., Mayer, R., & Benziman, M. (1991) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.55.1.35-58.1991 · Cited by 1,231
Self-citationCellulose Biosynthesis: Current Views and Evolving Concepts
SAXENA, I. M., & BROWN, R. M. (2005) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mci155 · Cited by 424
Recent advances in bacterial cellulose production
Shoda, M., & Sugano, Y. (2005) · Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering · doi:10.1007/bf02931175 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Wong, H. C., Fear, A. L., Calhoon, R. D., Eichinger, G. H., Mayer, R., Amikam, D., Benziman, M., Gelfand, D. H., Meade, J. H., & Emerick, A. W.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1990-10
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 8130-8134
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2111206904
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic organization of the cellulose synthase operon in Acetobacter xylinum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.87.20.8130
- The paper
- Wong, H. C., Fear, A. L., Calhoon, R. D., Eichinger, G. H., Mayer, R., Amikam, D., Benziman, M., Gelfand, D. H., Meade, J. H., & Emerick, A. W. (1990). Genetic organization of the cellulose synthase operon in Acetobacter xylinum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.20.8130
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.