The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tetraethylammonium blockade distinguishes two inactivation mechanisms in voltage-activated K+ channels.
Open accessAbstract
Voltage-activated K+ channels are a family of closely related membrane proteins that differ in their gating behavior, conductance, and pharmacology. A prominent and physiologically important difference among K+ channels is their rate of inactivation. Inactivation rates range from milliseconds to seconds, and K+ channels with different inactivation properties have very different effects on signal integration and repetitive firing properties of neurons. The cloned Shaker B (H4) potassium channel is an example of a K+ channel that inactivates in a few milliseconds. Recent experiments have shown that removal of an N-terminal region of the Shaker protein by site-directed deletion practically abolishes this fast inactivation, but the modified channel does still inactivate during a prolonged depolarization lasting many seconds. Here we report that this remnant inactivation must occur by a distinct mechanism from the rapid inactivation of the wild-type Shaker channel. Like the inactivation of another K+ channel [Grissmer, S. & Calahan, M. (1989) Biophys. J. 55, 203-206], this slow inactivation is retarded by the application of a channel blocker, tetraethylammonium, to the extracellular side of the channel. By contrast, the fast inactivation of the wild-type Shaker channel is sensitive only to intracellular application of tetraethylammonium. Intracellular tetraethylammonium slows down the fast inactivation process, as though it competes with the binding of the inactivation particle.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hamill, O. P., Marty, A., Neher, E., Sakmann, B., & Sigworth, F. J. (1981) · Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1007/bf00656997 · Cited by 18,436
Interaction of Tetraethylammonium Ion Derivatives with the Potassium Channels of Giant Axons
Armstrong, C. M. (1971) · The Journal of General Physiology · doi:10.1085/jgp.58.4.413 · Cited by 929
Cited by
Potassium channel receptor site for the inactivation gate and quaternary amine inhibitors
Zhou, M., Morais-Cabral, J. H., Mann, S., & MacKinnon, R. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35079500 · Cited by 560
Wallner, M., Meera, P., & Toro, L. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.7.4137 · Cited by 373
Modulation of K+ current by frequency and external [K+]: A tale of two inactivation mechanisms
Baukrowitz, T., & Yellen, G. (1995) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(95)90185-x · Cited by 373
Self-citationMolecular driving forces determining potassium channel slow inactivation
Cordero-Morales, J. F., Jogini, V., Lewis, A., Vásquez, V., Cortes, D. M., Roux, B., & Perozo, E. (2007) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb1309 · Cited by 236
A gate in the selectivity filter of potassium channels
Bernèche, S., & Roux, B. (2005) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2004.12.019 · Cited by 214
Metadata
- Authors
- Choi, K. L., Aldrich, R. W., & Yellen, G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1991-06-15
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 5092-5095
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2073892495
- Cited by
- 439
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tetraethylammonium blockade distinguishes two inactivation mechanisms in voltage-activated K+ channels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.88.12.5092
- The paper
- Choi, K. L., Aldrich, R. W., & Yellen, G. (1991). Tetraethylammonium blockade distinguishes two inactivation mechanisms in voltage-activated K+ channels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.88.12.5092
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.