Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 516

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Parameters of the human genome.

Open access
Morton, N E·1991·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Chromosome arm lengths are the critical parameters of the human genome. The physical length is required to scale radiation hybrid and other maps to megabases. The genetic lengths in males and females are required for probabilities of exclusion and synteny, choice of well-spaced loci for linkage tests, and comparison with centromeric maps based on nondisjunction. Interpolation of new data into a map is possible only when the length is known, including the distances from centromere and telomeres to the nearest markers. Current evidence on physical parameters including the reliable measurements of relative lengths from flow cytometry but only a crude estimate of genome size (3200 megabases). Evidence on genetic parameters includes chiasma counts and linkage maps corrected for failure to sample telomeres, giving an autosomal size of 2809 centimorgans in males and 4782 centimorgans in females. Estimates of the physical and sex-specific genetic lengths are presented for each chromosome arm. Any linkage analysis that yields substantially larger estimates raises a suspicion of an inappropriate mapping function or typing errors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.88.17.7474

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Morton, N. E.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1991-09
Volume
88
Issue
17
Pages
7474-7476
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2039128321
Cited by
516
References
0
FWCI
14.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.